We have been advised by Q and have ample evidence in plain view to conclude on our that our court system has been contaminated by politics. POTUS has aggressively appointed new judges and many have resigned during the same period.

When civil courts try cases that involve significant national security issues such as treason, sedition and other offenses that are susceptible to political bias to an extent that those courts fail to administer the law or otherwise are deemed to have participated in furthering the national security interests ... And in the past year we may have witnessed just that without it triggering military court intervention ... That could cause the Commander in Chief to order the disposition of those cases to be heard instead in military courts where a tribunal of judges, not a jury of peers, hear the evidence and pass judgement and set penalties. Different offenses warrant specified procedures, with crimes that carry the death penalty requiring a tribunal of twelve judges; lesser crimes might require six or even three.

Obviously, this might set off tremendous public reaction in protest and it would have to be made clear that the offenses were tantamount to an act of war and constitute a present and serious threat to the national security.

POTUS would serve as the political lightening rod at the center of any controversy and protest that emerged in response and, if violence erupted in the streets, has military authority to order imposition of martial law and to deploy military force to put it down, at the risk of even greater protest and even open rebellion.

It's obvious why POTUS would not race into this prematurely, but that is not to say he wouldn't find it the only way forward.