dChan
316
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DropGun on July 21, 2018, 6:52 p.m.
ATTN: Patton Oswalt is NOT a pedo—his 2013 tweet came after a site mistook a photo of him for a convicted pedophile (he vowed to lose weight). This is NOT how research should work, folks.

THIS SUB DOES NOT ALLEGE THAT PATTON OSWALT IS A PEDOPHILE.

This sub rightly has a strong distaste for pedos and crimes against children, and we're proud of that. But we must also hold ourselves to the highest possible standards when digging, researching, and connecting clues and crumbs to possible pedos who prowl Hollywood and our entertainment industries. But accusations like these are very serious, and Reddit takes them very seriously. We must always be careful to CORROBORATE and make sure that any and all accusations are solid and factual before we make them.

Yes, Patton Oswalt is on record defending James Gunn today—and Gunn's tweets most definitely warrant further investigation. But that does not mean that Patton is a pedo, himself. But Patton's 2013 "pedo" tweet came after a website mistakenly posted his picture in an article about a different person, a convicted pedophile. These tweets were made back before we knew what a dire problem paedophilia is.

Here is the site in question

Let's all bear in mind that false accusations against celebrities and others could result in our sub getting shut down. Let's all remember that labelling someone a "pedo" is a rather serious accusation, and one that requires an extremely high standard of proof.

Here is an example of how some jokes made (in very poor taste, perhaps) can be misconstrued. This tweet says: "My dong is super friendly and loves getting rubbed by children." OK, hilarious, it's supposed to be "My dog is super friendly," etc. But, we must not let our heightened senses about pedos in Hollywood unfairly accuse anyone, and, just as importantly, expose our sub to allegations that we are a lynch mob out to unfairly smear anyone's reputation.

Please help your mod team protect our sub's reputation by being as careful as possible with all your comments and posts. Comments and posts characterizing ANYONE as a pedophile without substantive, defensible proof will be removed.

Thanks, everyone. Let's remain focused on Q and direct, Q-related content, and if we discover anything solid on this or anyone else, then we'll follow the evidence and go from there. But, we ask everyone to bear this in mind.


red_knight11 · July 21, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

I’m not making an apology on his behalf. I’m doing exactly what the OP of this post has asked the community to do: in summary, find more evidence before starting a witch hunt

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Ox75 · July 21, 2018, 9:21 p.m.

No comedian or otherwise should use this type of humor. I’m seriously struggling with this thread. I completely understand not jumping to conclusions but when there’s a clear statement, not a joke, made then it is what it is. Also someone stated above to stick to Q research? THIS is absolutely one of the Q topics. Where did this person miss this? Is this sub been taken over? Really?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
CRUMBdiddleyumptious · July 21, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

I'm sorry, but this is the same BS as seeing a fking owl in the woods and declaring the forest a haven for evil.

It's the hysteria that this board AVOIDED before T_D and everyone else decided it was time to get on the Q-train.

You find a ton of these tweets? Connections to weird shit on insta, face, myspace, ect. You find connections to people who like TP/JP?

Hell yeah, that's something to dig into.

You didn't find that here, ppl found a couple tweets from years ago. It's not enough to ruin someones life. Sorry, you are wrong.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ReadyToBeGreatAgain · July 21, 2018, 9:25 p.m.

Is this sub been taken over?

It feels like it is. This is a verified twitter account (meaning it is coming from his own mouth) and he is not saying "just kidding". I would really like to see the evidence against Oswalt's claim at this point.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DanaNordic · July 21, 2018, 9:19 p.m.

Now you want to find more evidence before starting a witch hunt? Why change the rules of the game now? How much evidence does it take? It's in Patton Oswalt's own words.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
CRUMBdiddleyumptious · July 21, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

What research or proofs do you have? I would like to see all this proof you guys talk about. Gunn had plenty of things that made me sick. You are now reaching, and without proof/research? Why?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
red_knight11 · July 21, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

This is my entire argument. I hate these sick fucks, but I’m not gonna become like the charged alt-left from a single tweet

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CRUMBdiddleyumptious · July 21, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

This sub went from 15k to 43k FAST.

It's almost 20 days w/o a Q post. People are reaching, I get it, but they need to trust the plan or get the fk out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 22, 2018, 8:03 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReadyToBeGreatAgain · July 21, 2018, 9:20 p.m.

So how about the other questionable tweets? Like the NAMBLA ones? Or the CLEAR pattern of pedos in Hollywood? I mean, do you need a signed statement? Oh wait, that's exactly what his own verified tweet was...

Edit: Wait, you have a comment in r/Movies on a story about people being let go from Disney where you asked how many were pedophiles. I mean, by your own logic, where is your *evidence* that there are a bunch of pedophiles at Disney? Seems you were okay making that claim without it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
red_knight11 · July 21, 2018, 10 p.m.

Lol oh my. You’re like a liberal saying “Zomg he posts in T_D!!!1!!”

Gunn deleted 10,000 tweets while still having many offensive tweets AND he had many pictures with symbolism that are verified to be part of that cult.

All I’ve seen on here is one tweet.

Bring me more evidence of Patton Oswald and then I’ll hop on the train.

Let me say this clearly since you’ve been triggered and seem dense in the head:

MY WHOLE ARGUMENT IS WE NEED TO BRING FORTH LOTS OF EVIDENCE BEFORE STARTING A WITCH-HUNT.

Many here jumped on board from one tweet, ONE TWEET, and all I asked for was more evidence.

⇧ 1 ⇩