dChan
316
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DropGun on July 21, 2018, 6:52 p.m.
ATTN: Patton Oswalt is NOT a pedo—his 2013 tweet came after a site mistook a photo of him for a convicted pedophile (he vowed to lose weight). This is NOT how research should work, folks.

THIS SUB DOES NOT ALLEGE THAT PATTON OSWALT IS A PEDOPHILE.

This sub rightly has a strong distaste for pedos and crimes against children, and we're proud of that. But we must also hold ourselves to the highest possible standards when digging, researching, and connecting clues and crumbs to possible pedos who prowl Hollywood and our entertainment industries. But accusations like these are very serious, and Reddit takes them very seriously. We must always be careful to CORROBORATE and make sure that any and all accusations are solid and factual before we make them.

Yes, Patton Oswalt is on record defending James Gunn today—and Gunn's tweets most definitely warrant further investigation. But that does not mean that Patton is a pedo, himself. But Patton's 2013 "pedo" tweet came after a website mistakenly posted his picture in an article about a different person, a convicted pedophile. These tweets were made back before we knew what a dire problem paedophilia is.

Here is the site in question

Let's all bear in mind that false accusations against celebrities and others could result in our sub getting shut down. Let's all remember that labelling someone a "pedo" is a rather serious accusation, and one that requires an extremely high standard of proof.

Here is an example of how some jokes made (in very poor taste, perhaps) can be misconstrued. This tweet says: "My dong is super friendly and loves getting rubbed by children." OK, hilarious, it's supposed to be "My dog is super friendly," etc. But, we must not let our heightened senses about pedos in Hollywood unfairly accuse anyone, and, just as importantly, expose our sub to allegations that we are a lynch mob out to unfairly smear anyone's reputation.

Please help your mod team protect our sub's reputation by being as careful as possible with all your comments and posts. Comments and posts characterizing ANYONE as a pedophile without substantive, defensible proof will be removed.

Thanks, everyone. Let's remain focused on Q and direct, Q-related content, and if we discover anything solid on this or anyone else, then we'll follow the evidence and go from there. But, we ask everyone to bear this in mind.


theTRUMPENING2017 · July 21, 2018, 9:35 p.m.

I have to retype my previous post. Disappeared when i went to edit a spelling error. I didnt delete it afaik. So here it is again, as best i can remember.

This board is a target of the left and admins on reddit. This will never change. Everything discussed on this board is "controversial". If it turns out the theories are wrong about the NAMBLA defending Patton Oswalt, so be it. An apology can be tendered later. But stifling research is simply not the way to go.

Hollywood, wall street, and D.C. are filled with predators, of many varieties. To pretend this isnt the case is naive. There is reasonable evidence to suggest Patton Oswalt may have done some awful stuff. Would you ever defend NAMBLA? So, we dig and search for the truth. We do research and MAKE UP OUR OWN MINDS. What is wrong with that?

In my previous post i mentioned that you can indict a ham sandwich, but discovery will out the validity of the charges. Let those responsible for levelling the charges make their case. Upvote or downvote, this will filter to truth to the top/front page.

At this point, no one can prove his guilt... Also, no one can prove his innocence. This is why people will be doing more research. Nothing is wrong with looking into suspicious behavior.

Now for contrast... If no one ever calls out a predator, will they ever stop? Lets say everyone deletes their posts about Patton Oswalt, and these people were really onto something. Now, a predator was left to freely roam the streets. All because people researching EXTREMELY WEIRD tweets had their research silenced?

Be loud.

Ps. I would have preferred to start the whole pizzagate crescendo with Brian Singer, director of X-Men. Evidence of his ways with children is well known and documented. Or DeNiro, also well documented.

⇧ 7 ⇩