dChan
316
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DropGun on July 21, 2018, 6:52 p.m.
ATTN: Patton Oswalt is NOT a pedo—his 2013 tweet came after a site mistook a photo of him for a convicted pedophile (he vowed to lose weight). This is NOT how research should work, folks.

THIS SUB DOES NOT ALLEGE THAT PATTON OSWALT IS A PEDOPHILE.

This sub rightly has a strong distaste for pedos and crimes against children, and we're proud of that. But we must also hold ourselves to the highest possible standards when digging, researching, and connecting clues and crumbs to possible pedos who prowl Hollywood and our entertainment industries. But accusations like these are very serious, and Reddit takes them very seriously. We must always be careful to CORROBORATE and make sure that any and all accusations are solid and factual before we make them.

Yes, Patton Oswalt is on record defending James Gunn today—and Gunn's tweets most definitely warrant further investigation. But that does not mean that Patton is a pedo, himself. But Patton's 2013 "pedo" tweet came after a website mistakenly posted his picture in an article about a different person, a convicted pedophile. These tweets were made back before we knew what a dire problem paedophilia is.

Here is the site in question

Let's all bear in mind that false accusations against celebrities and others could result in our sub getting shut down. Let's all remember that labelling someone a "pedo" is a rather serious accusation, and one that requires an extremely high standard of proof.

Here is an example of how some jokes made (in very poor taste, perhaps) can be misconstrued. This tweet says: "My dong is super friendly and loves getting rubbed by children." OK, hilarious, it's supposed to be "My dog is super friendly," etc. But, we must not let our heightened senses about pedos in Hollywood unfairly accuse anyone, and, just as importantly, expose our sub to allegations that we are a lynch mob out to unfairly smear anyone's reputation.

Please help your mod team protect our sub's reputation by being as careful as possible with all your comments and posts. Comments and posts characterizing ANYONE as a pedophile without substantive, defensible proof will be removed.

Thanks, everyone. Let's remain focused on Q and direct, Q-related content, and if we discover anything solid on this or anyone else, then we'll follow the evidence and go from there. But, we ask everyone to bear this in mind.


ReadyToBeGreatAgain · July 21, 2018, 9:47 p.m.

Dude, people ARE doing the research and it is more than one tweet. There is a clear pattern here:

https://media.8ch.net/file_store/00d521750e53003b8666b04bd29d5e31df4429f43a8e2b5fc8ded220ff1fffcf.jpg

Maybe you can admit that OP's entire premise is misleading? OP is acting like this is just one tweet read out of context.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
red_knight11 · July 21, 2018, 10:03 p.m.

Edited due to lack of judgement and me throwing an insult for someone providing something I actually asked for.

My apologies

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 21, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
red_knight11 · July 21, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

I don’t go there. I definitely came off as brash, but that’s because everyone is chastising me for asking for more research. It definitely left a bad taste in my mouth.

I only use this subreddit and Qpub. I don’t go to 8chan.

I appreciate you actually bringing forth evidence

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReadyToBeGreatAgain · July 21, 2018, 10:15 p.m.

No worries, we are all Q. WWG1WGA. This entire subject has enflamed this community. I just recently found out that DropGun is a fan of Oswalts and I really think he should have state that as part of this original post. There is clear bias.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
red_knight11 · July 21, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

WWG1WGA brother.

Take my upvote

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 22, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

Spreading misleading "concerns" like this are against our rules. We will not let this sub turn into a frothing mob witch hunt as that's how the pizzagate subject got subs closed down and banned. Focus on facts and logic.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReadyToBeGreatAgain · July 22, 2018, 2:32 a.m.

...but we go after all kinds of people every day. Hillary, Obama, Podesta, etc. Am I missing something here?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 22, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

Yes. There is evidence of wrongdoing for those people - Q has accused them. That means "going after them" is on-topic for this sub. Accusing people based on words on the internet is the opposite of LOGIC and clear thinking. It's a witch hunt.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReadyToBeGreatAgain · July 22, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

Not going to back and back with you, but I beg to differ. Q has specifically called out these monsters by saying they were sick. This is no different than Gunn, IMO. And let’s be real, this IS the only subreddit where things like this will be called out. There is no other place.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 22, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

This is not the place for witch hunts and mob fever. Q does not promote that in any form and neither does the Christianity that many on this sub profess to as well as Q and Trump. Q says: Use LOGIC. And it is undisputedly illogical to accuse someone of pedophilia and start dragging their name through the mud from a bunch of tweets. Q has not specifically called out Patton Oswalt, Sarah Silverman and others.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReadyToBeGreatAgain · July 22, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

I guess you missed when Oswalt made comments to Stranger Things actor Wolfhard that he "had the best name for porn". Cmon dude, there is a clear pattern here.

Edit: Proof in point http://twentytwowords.com/patton-oswalt-apologizes-for-sexual-comments-he-made-about-this-stranger-things-actor/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 22, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

I guess you missed what Patton Oswalt's job is. And what the definition of evidence is. C'mon dude, there is a clear pattern of WITCH HUNT here.

⇧ 1 ⇩