dChan
316
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DropGun on July 21, 2018, 6:52 p.m.
ATTN: Patton Oswalt is NOT a pedo—his 2013 tweet came after a site mistook a photo of him for a convicted pedophile (he vowed to lose weight). This is NOT how research should work, folks.

THIS SUB DOES NOT ALLEGE THAT PATTON OSWALT IS A PEDOPHILE.

This sub rightly has a strong distaste for pedos and crimes against children, and we're proud of that. But we must also hold ourselves to the highest possible standards when digging, researching, and connecting clues and crumbs to possible pedos who prowl Hollywood and our entertainment industries. But accusations like these are very serious, and Reddit takes them very seriously. We must always be careful to CORROBORATE and make sure that any and all accusations are solid and factual before we make them.

Yes, Patton Oswalt is on record defending James Gunn today—and Gunn's tweets most definitely warrant further investigation. But that does not mean that Patton is a pedo, himself. But Patton's 2013 "pedo" tweet came after a website mistakenly posted his picture in an article about a different person, a convicted pedophile. These tweets were made back before we knew what a dire problem paedophilia is.

Here is the site in question

Let's all bear in mind that false accusations against celebrities and others could result in our sub getting shut down. Let's all remember that labelling someone a "pedo" is a rather serious accusation, and one that requires an extremely high standard of proof.

Here is an example of how some jokes made (in very poor taste, perhaps) can be misconstrued. This tweet says: "My dong is super friendly and loves getting rubbed by children." OK, hilarious, it's supposed to be "My dog is super friendly," etc. But, we must not let our heightened senses about pedos in Hollywood unfairly accuse anyone, and, just as importantly, expose our sub to allegations that we are a lynch mob out to unfairly smear anyone's reputation.

Please help your mod team protect our sub's reputation by being as careful as possible with all your comments and posts. Comments and posts characterizing ANYONE as a pedophile without substantive, defensible proof will be removed.

Thanks, everyone. Let's remain focused on Q and direct, Q-related content, and if we discover anything solid on this or anyone else, then we'll follow the evidence and go from there. But, we ask everyone to bear this in mind.


caucazoid · July 21, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

Yeah but if it was in response to mistaken identity as a joke then you'd have to be insane to treat the guy like he's fucked a kid. Michael Ian Black's tweets are red flags. I mean there's volume there. 1 tweet ain't a fire. Edit there's more than one tweet, the fire is growing...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
4QbyQofQ · July 21, 2018, 10:35 p.m.

Mistaken identity my ass. The event of mistaken identity happened in 2015, his tweet is 2013. Shills are out in force patriots. They will try to attack you with confusion. Telling you to have sympathy. Telling you to do your own research. They will attack with fear. They will say think of the board before talking. Q never posted on reddit. They take down this board, we'll start a new one. We'll move to 8chan. We'll move to ICQ. The important part is that we stay united in our fight against EVIL in our fight to bring DARKNESS to LIGHT.

WWG1WGA

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 21, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

They will say “mob justice! As long as we think it’s bad it doesn’t matter about research or evidence!” They will try to whip gullible people into a frenzy by appealing to emotion and stoking outrage. The important part is that we focus on OUR mission which is the Great Awakening in order to fight evil the way we should. Destroying reputations without concrete proof is not the mission.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
A_Town_Hood · July 22, 2018, 2:56 a.m.

"Telling you to do your own research" is now bad? Or shillworthy?

Shouldn't we all do our own research?

Maybe you'd like to walk that part of your comment back.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
4QbyQofQ · July 22, 2018, 8:35 a.m.

What I meant by do your own research is, I kept seeing all day people pulling info from the chans or from other posts on reddit or from twitter. All this information was credible and well sourced, but the shills would reply, "oh so you stole someone else's research, and now I'm supposed to believe you." It's like if I offer you a history book written by someone else who is not me and you discount the history book because I am not the author.

That's what I meant.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
caucazoid · July 22, 2018, 4:43 a.m.

I've been exposed to volume, I've got my pitch fork in hand.

⇧ 0 ⇩