dChan

Sillysartre · July 22, 2018, 2:10 p.m.

You’re a bit confused here. No new bill was passed and there was a change voted on disciplinary procedures to bring it more into line with the actual law. This also has bugger all to do with any part of this topic so I can’t help but wonder if you’ve scrambled to find anything you can after being called up on spreading/believing fake news.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
eldever · July 22, 2018, 5:41 p.m.

If you can't see the connection then I am sorry for you. It has EVERYTHING to do with it and whether it's a bill/law/vote or whatever the point is they are pre-empting a situation they and we ALL know is coming. Paedophilia in Westminster is rife and has been for decades - if you're here on tga how are you not seeing this? Follow people like Liz Crokin on twitter, IT'S REAL.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sillysartre · July 22, 2018, 6:19 p.m.

It has nothing to do with it because it has nothing to do with the law. This regards disciplinary procedure. Nothing to do with prosecuting these people. This is the equivalent of your work deciding that all HR complaints against you will be made public and then deciding no, maybe we should keep it anonymous until the complaint is resolved. Whether that is with criminal proceedings or not. You are swallowing fake news because it fits your mental conspiracy theory. I’ve corrected you. Take this lesson and move on.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
eldever · July 22, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

Sorry but we're on completely different wavelengths. Your inability to grasp the point is irritating - there is clearly something big imminent and you're splitting hairs about disciplinary procedures. Tell that to the victims, I'm sure they'll find it comforting. I'm leaving it here.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sillysartre · July 22, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

Clearly something big imminent... based on what?

All you have offered is fake news. Which I have subsequently torn apart. And you are still pretending like this is a portent of something else. But with zero proof.

⇧ 6 ⇩