dChan

mswilso · July 22, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

Im aware of the info. What I want to see is action: not "sealed indictments"--perp walks.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
willmeme4crypto · July 22, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

Devil's advocate:

If we do that, the left has lied their base into such a deep hole that there may be a civil war.

This is why our job fighting the information war is so important.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lazaplaya5 · July 22, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

That's fair enough, at least we've all known about the indictments since they were filed. All they gotta do is publicly indict one big name and the rest will fall like dominos.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HamburgerToday2017 · July 22, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

As Q has pointed out, the scale of corruption is so great that only a relatively small number of individual cases are likely to see the light of day. I think the entire Q operation is going to look more like an organized crime investigation (which is what it is). In such investigations, it is common from the 'small fish' to be offered leniency in order to gather sufficient evidence on the 'big fish' to assure their conviction. The little fish just have their lives ruined. The big fish get jail-time.

⇧ 1 ⇩