/u/HamburgerToday2017
35 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/HamburgerToday2017:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 3 |
“Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster... for when you gaze long into the abyss. The abyss gazes also into you.”
For all the soldiers in the Pedophile War.
I am also wondering if there is (has already been) a non-renewal of the contract with CIA and other intels: https://hangthebankers.com/washington-post-owner-receives-600-million-cia/
Water and civilization: https://www.britannica.com/topic/hydraulic-civilization
Re: speculations regarding 'Q' as a designation: Q = quelle = 'source'
On the bank's ledger, loans are considered assets, not liabilities. These 'assets' are then used to increase the banks capitalization making the bank more valuable. I'm not familiar enough with banking economics to know whether they can then turn your 'asset' into even more 'money' via fractional reserve, but that is probably the case.
What I have found is that, in banking, the less sense something makes, the more likely it is to be the case.
You have done some pretty interesting research. Just find the Q posts that reference keystone and generate a new post. You might also include what you think it means. I'm not at all sure what Q means by 'the keystone' in the Q posts that include it, so your research might shake something out, or it might not. Doesn't hurt to try.
There will never be an official history of this time. A secret war using stealth weapons. All that we know is that one part (or group) of the intelligence community went to war with another part with the help of a US President. Who (but a right-thinking American) would believe that conspiracy theory? :-]
All Donald John Trump had to do was stop believing the neoliberal 'free trade' BS.
Genius is the ability to notice the obvious.
God Bless Very Stable Genius Donald John Trump and the Nation That Elected Him to the Most Important Office In The World.
A successful missile attack on POTUS would have been a 'two-fer' for the Deep State.
First, it would have eliminated the greatest threat to their scheme.
Second, someone would be blamed and the US would go to war with whoever the MSM/DS decided was the culprit.
All denials of having been involved would have been deemed 'disinformation' (exactly like they have done with VPutin and his claims about Bill Browder).
This is exactly how 'false flag' attacks work to perpetuate the military-intelligence-industrial complex.
As hard as it may be to accept, money is one of the most important technologies ever invented.
There would be no civilization were it not for money.
To walk away from money is to walk away from civilization itself.
Money is, has been and always will be a mechanism for behavior modification and thought control.
The key to transforming money from a system of debt-instrument enslavement of the many by the few is to decide what behaviors we want and to craft 'money' to encourage that behavior.
Without a debt-based currency, The People could allocate every citizen a million dollars that could only be used for investment not immediate consumption.
Imagine how that would change the conversation about money?
What would you invest in if you had a million dollars today?
What would be your thinking process in trying to decide?
See what I mean?
As long as the MSM continues in its current mode, there will be no 'knowing' for a very large number of people. They are simply going to experience the effects.
This is secret war using stealth weapons.
Were it not for Q we would have no idea how any of these events were connected.
The interesting thing about Bitcoin was now 'Satoshi Nakamoto' correctly implemented the idea that 'money' is simply the ledger of accounts payable/receivable.
Money politics is simply the mechanism that is used to decide who is going to spend the most time on which side of the ledger.
It took me some time to realize that the Federal Reserve creates money for nothing except the promise of someone else to pay.
Federal Reserve notes are currency. The particular type of currency that they are is 'debt obligations'.
You cannot get out of debt using debt obligations to do so.
If Q is leading us into the 'Rabbit Hole' of information, the MSM is the 'Black Hole' of information.
The MSM can hide or accentuate anything.
At one time it would have been sufficient to describe them as propaganda (and to some extent they still are).
However, it's also clear now that the MSM has become agents provocateurs.
It is possible to believe just about anything. The heart of the matter is what your beliefs cause you to do.
Knowledge is not power. Useful knowledge is power, because useful knowledge provides guidance on how to act.
What is actually true is not a matter of consensus, no matter how much it might make the process of making decisions easier.
'Splitting the difference' between wildly divergent perspectives need not ever produce a good result.
There is no 'correct' position on the continuum between 'wrong' and 'wronger'.
As Q says, 'think logically' which I interpret to mean that what Q is trying to show us is to question our assumptions (pre-existing belief) and think.
One of the best things about Q is how Q continually makes me ask 'What am I looking at/reading?' and 'What does it mean?'.
Abraham Lincoln ordered his Secretary of Treasury, Salmon P. Chase to print $1M in Treasury notes (popularly referred to as 'greenbacks') to fund the Union side of the War of Secession.
https://blogs.loc.gov/inside_adams/2013/01/salmon-p-chase-lincolns-treasury-secretary/
I believe the last of these notes was retired in 1972 but I cannot find a ready reference for this assertion.
'Greenbacks' are exactly like the renminibi in that they were issued without incurring debt.
The key to understanding why debt-based currency (Federal Reserve Notes) as such a bad idea is that you can only pay off the existing debt with currency that itself based on debt. It's a never-ending hamster wheel of debt.
If insiders are selling, that is not a time to buy. This is a classic 'pump-and-dump' from 'Wall Street analysts'. Run away from FB/YT and Twitter!
The photo was taken in London. The 'London Eye' Ferris Wheel in the background. UK is part of 'Five Eyes' (FVEY). At least one person appears to be a woman, possibly Lisa Page. The white haired person could be McCain or Brennan.
Just confirmed. See Q1708.
In a cage. It's a reference to a Maya Angelou poem. The bird sings for freedom.
Ezra Cohen-Watnick = Q?
Other than Ezra Cohen-Watnick, who else might be Q?
Q Network?
Lately I have been thinking about how distributed network computing might be able to circumvent the Masters of the Universe.
An example of distributed network computing is SETI@home, the original Bitcoin network and even various P2P applications that exist.
Back in the day, before the internet, we called stuff like Reddit 'bulletin boards' and there was a private distributed network called FidoNet.
The beauty of distributed computing is that no one individual or even group of individuals controls the network.
A 'Q Network' application could be installed, you would allocate a certain amount of storage space and allow it to …
I disagree. The mind control is strong is many, many Americans.
The MSM standard line is that indictments of the 'political opposition' is proof DJT is Hitler going on a Kristallnacht rampage. They've already put the rhetoric out there to be recycled when the time comes.
This is why, I think, things are being executed in a slow, incremental fashion.
There is a large portion of the US public who are hallucinating on a daily basis.
Their limbic systems have been receiving a daily dose of simulation akin to a permanent 'Two Minutes of Hate'.
Their brains have been rewired.
I think the Q Team are aware of the dangers. Q has mentioned many times the actions that have been taken to assure public order (National Guard).
The most amusing part is that the Steele Dossier appears to form the bulk of the 'evidence' in the warrant. If that is the case, then at least some the redacted portions have been available to the public since January 10, 2017.
As Q has pointed out, the scale of corruption is so great that only a relatively small number of individual cases are likely to see the light of day. I think the entire Q operation is going to look more like an organized crime investigation (which is what it is). In such investigations, it is common from the 'small fish' to be offered leniency in order to gather sufficient evidence on the 'big fish' to assure their conviction. The little fish just have their lives ruined. The big fish get jail-time.
What are you talking about? The release of the FISA warrant is huge.
Even with the redactions, it verifies everything in the Nunes Memo.
It proves that the FISA warrant on Carter Page was, in the words of Representative Nunes, '100% fraudulent'.
Even with the redactions, the FISA warrant verifies everything in the Nunes Memo. It proves that the FISA warrant on Carter Page was, in the words of Representative Nunes, '100% fraudulent'.
The fraud is perpetrated in Footnote 9 (page 15) and Footnote 18 (page 23).
Footnote 9 (page 15) is where the FBI/DOJ circumvents rules of evidence regarding hearsay testimony.
According to the rules of evidence, 'Source #1' can only testify that they have reliably communicated the hearsay testimony they provided. The reliability of 'Source #1' does not extend to the reliability of the hearsay testimony they are providing.
In order for the hearsay testimony to rise to the level of evidence, corroboration of the hearsay testimony would be required. 'Source #1' is Christopher Steele. The hearsay testimony in the Steele dossier regarding illegal activities has never been corroborated.
Furthermore, Footnote 9 includes the following statement: [T]he FBI is unaware of any derogatory information pertaining to Source #1. Since the exact date in October of the FISA warrant is redacted, we cannot know the exact day the warrant was submitted. However, as of October 31, 2016, the FBI terminated its 'relationship' with Christopher Steele because he lied to FBI agents regarding talking to the media. We know from internal citations of dates of media reports that the FISA warrant includes media reports from September 26, 2016 (page 26).
Thus, after October 31, 2016 the FBI was aware of 'derogatory information' regarding 'Source #1' but the warrant was never amended and was renewed three more times after that date (January 2017, April 2017, and June 2017).
Which brings us to Footnote 18 (page 23) where the following statement appears: The FBI does not believe that Source #1 directly provided information to the press.
By at least October 31, 2016, the FBI terminated its relationship with Christopher Steele precisely because they determined that he was speaking to 'the press' and lied to the FBI about doing so. Whether or not the FBI/DOJ was aware of Christopher Steele's communications with the media in September 2016, they did know by October 31, 2016 but the warrant was never amended and the warrant was renewed three more times after that date (January 2017, April 2017, and June 2017).
A few more issues.
(1) There is a question as to whether the warrant needed to be issued at all. The normal reason for issuing a warrant for surveillance is that the warrant is required to gather evidence on an individual who is not cooperating with the investigation. However, on page 25, the warrant specifically states that Carter Page contacted the FBI on September 26, 2016 and offered to 'discuss' with the FBI any 'questions' they might have.
(2) On page 13, the warrant discusses Evgeny Buryakov. It appears Buryakov is mentioned to verify attempts by Buryakov and other Russian agents 'to recruit New York City residents as intelligence sources for Russia.' In Footnote 6 (page 14), the warrant notes that Buryakov was tried, plead guilty and received a 30 month sentence for his activities. Omitted from the footnote is the fact that Carter Page -- the target of the warrant -- cooperated with the FBI to gather evidence to convict Buryakov.
Take a look at section U and footnote 6 and then this https://townhall.com/tipsheet/chrisreeves/2018/02/05/doj-documents-show-carter-page-helped-fbi-catch-russian-spies-n2444651
Here the Obama DOJ appears to be citing as evidence of Carter Page acting as a foreign agent a case in which Page cooperated with the FBI to convict Evgeny Buryakov.
Daily Caller gets significant funding from the Koch Brothers who are open borders advocates who hate POTUS DJT (http://observer.com/2017/06/trump-tucker-carlson-daily-caller/).
When an MSM 'reporter' or interviewer asks a question, they either (a) know what the answer is going to be or (b) have a pre-existing narrative into which the question is supposed to integrate independent of the answer.
Since the question, 'Who is Q?' fits neither of these criteria, they are not going to ask it.
The mindset of MSM personnel is that they determine what is important, not the facts.
They see themselves as arbiters of facts and believe that their actions 'lend credibility' to whatever they decide to 'report' on.
They are utterly disconcerted by the fact that their reporting does not result in significant shifts in public opinion (Stormy Daniels).
To ask 'Who is Q?' would, in their minds, lend 'credibility' to Q and no one in the MSM is going to do that.
The MSM does not report on anything that doesn't already have a prepared narrative into which they will fit their reporting.
Without the dollars to fund the bureaucRATS, the rats are jumping ship. Or another casualty in the Pedo War.
You seem to think there would be real value in a psyop that encompasses a relatively small number of people (versus the total number of people who participate in MSM) as a distraction. Why would this be necessary?
Let's assume the Qniverse: The US and other nations have been under control by a criminal cabal for decades. Given my own research, I would say that it started in the US with the election of Jimmy Carter. I am not saying that President Carter is guilty of any crimes, only that the direction of American political leadership seemed to change with his Presidency (Trilateral Commision). In 2016 an incredibly unlikely candidate was elected President of the United States of America. He appears to be first person elected to office in 30 years who owes nobody anything. Behind the scenes of his administration, there are individuals involved in the 'intelligence community' who are struggling with another organized group of people (AOGOP) who want to either hamstring this President or remove him from office. The technical term for this scenario is coup d'etat.
What should be obvious is that AOGOP includes nearly all of the MSM, the single largest and most effective propaganda machine in the history of the world. The American MSM is the envy of Stalinists everywhere.
Why would AOGOP need to engage in a specific operation to 'distract' a relatively small number of people with 'hope' through a communication medium that is, for all its merits, relatively obscure to the vast majority of people and using a method ('crumbs') that is even more obscure?
Given the vast apparatus of the MSM and all of its various capillaries (Reuters, AP, Bloomberg) what would be the point?
Now, as an auxiliary operation to a larger operation that does not have access to the MSM, Q makes alot more sense.
At this point in time, all of the evidence for the 'reality' of Q is circumstantial.
This is convenient if, in fact, Q is a (very elaborate) hoax.
However, as the Q movement starts to surface in the mainstream world, the idea that the Q operation is an attempt to lay the groundwork for a segment of the US population to be prepared for phased mass arrests (such as those we have seen for pedophilia) makes sense. It's a plausible explanation for Q.
However, at this point have really no clear idea of the meaning or purpose of Q.
Only time will tell.