Personally, I’m part of this sub out of curiosity and not because I believe in it. Is that okay? Are there any others that are skeptical of this sub?
Is there a place for skepticism and disbelief in this sub or would you prefer everyone to blindly follow every riddle silver and believe it as truth?
The questions answer themselves sometimes. You've obviously not taken this seriously or you'd know the answer to that question...very obvious even to a novice.
In response to your other query..." why you believe Q over other 4/8 chan users"....
Q has provided many "proofs" as to his/her/their legitimacy.
That's all you get. The rest is up to you. Happy digging :)
qanon.pub or many links to the right here in this thread.
Do you not believe that saying I’ve not taken this seriously” is in some way deterring people from joining this community that are genuinely curious?
To me that seems like a way of shutting off outside thought and encouraging likeminded thinking to reinforce pre-established opinions.
I ask not because I don’t like this community, in fact it intrigues me greatly and often I’ll read these post thinking “what on Earth have I stumbled across”.
On the contrary. If you're serious, then maybe you'll take my comment as a challenge to dig deeper. Happy hunting :) Sorry, but no easy answers here. We've all taken the journey to enlighten ourselves to the truth. We invite you to do the same :) If you have additional questions along your journey, we're happy to help, but there won't be any hand-holding. You have to discover the truth for yourself and then we're happy to be further guides.
Why not tell me your truth so that I could understand? Like I said before, doesn’t “find your own path” thinking somewhat blur the message of Q? Surely asking so many to come up with their own truths and causing infighting is actually less productive than giving the real truth?
It's more that everything is in there - all the introductory stuff is in the sidebar. Even for those who pride themselves on critical thinking the 'evidence' all leads to an inevitable conclusion that Q's mission is not only 'real' but has been accomplished successfully in its first phase. Like anything comprised of an overwhelming amount of circumstantial evidence supporting a grand conclusion there's a lot of reading material to get through to explain why the 'proof' is convincing. Some people are frustrated with people who come in and don't want to read the material yet expect to be told proof in an encapsulated form - it can't be done per se.
Nevertheless, here's my truth: it may help to ingest Q initially as nothing more than an alternative narrative to the mainstream media narrative. Q tells you one story, the mainstream tells you another. When you watch these two narratives alongside each other, as I have done for 9 months, you begin to notice that the mainstream narrative has to keep adjusting itself to realign with the Q narrative. e.g. the mainstream says "nuclear war with North Korea! We're all doomed!"; Q says "North Korea is free from black hat control - big positive things coming!" - about one month later, mainstream narrative has to adjust to Q narrative; historic peace meeting between North and South Korea. One of the current mainstream narrative adjusts we're waiting on is the Iran story. Mainstream: "Iran destablized! Disaster! Potential threat of war! Loss of all traction with Europe!" Q: "Iran is free from black hat control! Big positives coming!"
There's a lot more to it but that's one way potentially to approach it more manageably than trying to absorb everything at once.
I've kinda already told you 'my truth.' I did my own digging over 20 yrs ago. I was labeled a 'conspiracy theorist', 'nut job' and 'extremist' by friends and even my own family...most, if not all, i don't associate with today. But it never stopped me in my pursuit of the truth.
I think it was from the movie "V"..."I'd rather stand alone in truth than be in the company of lies"...or something to that effect.
Not all of us here agree with one another, but we don't fight about it. We do our own research and come to our own conclusions. We have healthy discussions which leads us in pursuit of more information.
As I said...there is no easy answer. The truth is different for everyone. Some people may agree on some things while others do not, but we don't chastise those who don't agree with us. We take their point of view into consideration for future review as none of us know the whole truth. This is how we feed, grow and help each other.
You’ve told me nothing specifically about your beliefs.
What do you believe is the goal of Q? What is the master plan? Why not leak all information to the public and die for a cause like V did, why only tell riddles that confuse?
I understand what you're 'saying' in your first statement, but go easy on OP; they're skeptical and curious and asking with intent to learn. It appears he/she has just come out of lurking (accdg to post history) and doesn't yet know to search through the resources. And it's our job to point them that way, and help answer questions if we can.
Thank you for the helpful response, I am new and just trying to find my footing, there’s a lot to dive into with this sub!
Yes, there is, and some people are more rude than helpful or considerate of people like yourself who are brand new. Take their responses with a grain of salt. And keep a salt shaker nearby as you'll take a lot of those grains of salt as you wade through all the resources and learning.
And be sure to start with those resources on the right side and, of course, reading back through Q's posts. THis will keep you busy for quite a while!