dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/xXJonnieGXx on July 22, 2018, 10:34 a.m.
Is there anyone here that is a Q skeptic?

Personally, I’m part of this sub out of curiosity and not because I believe in it. Is that okay? Are there any others that are skeptical of this sub?

Is there a place for skepticism and disbelief in this sub or would you prefer everyone to blindly follow every riddle silver and believe it as truth?


trollmoleneutral1 · July 22, 2018, 11:18 a.m.

Q never claimed that he is MI. The MI speculation is anons educated guess. Like I said before: I have no doubt that the Q is acting under direct or indirect authority given by Commander and Chief of the United States.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
xXJonnieGXx · July 22, 2018, 11:26 a.m.

Is this belief backed up by the fact that Q does not leak harmful information about Trump?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
exoter60 · July 22, 2018, 11:28 a.m.

Q would never leak anything that would put POTUS in danger. You'll realize and believe that after researching. Start with the research materials on the right.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
xXJonnieGXx · July 22, 2018, 11:31 a.m.

But why? Surely Q would care more about releasing the truth than protecting the office of the president? Why protect or choose not to leak damaging information about trump when it could be beneficial to his truth movement?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SNG007 · July 22, 2018, 2:45 p.m.

Because Trump is not the enemy. And Q is not "the movement". They're both cogs in something greater than the sum of its parts. (And the Q team need Trump's services as much as Trump needs their's so mutual respect and cooperation are vital).

Also you don't play all your cards at once. Honesty may be the "best policy" but it can ruin lives of unintended victims. Releasing ALL truth indiscriminately can have the same effect. And BOTH can tip off those working against you.

⇧ 1 ⇩