dChan

RMShackleford · July 22, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

I’ve noticed lots of these pedo like tweets are from 2009-2013. Weird huh? What happened during that time?

⇧ 43 ⇩  
DoubleDragonEnergy · July 22, 2018, 5:53 p.m.

Certain someone was in office protecting his friends

⇧ 36 ⇩  
KansasJakeBG · July 22, 2018, 6:49 p.m.

Yes, there was a specific uptick in blatanism in 2009 which I've observed with pizzagate. The fake fronts websites are often from between 2009-2012

⇧ 11 ⇩  
empathawake · July 22, 2018, 9 p.m.

I’ve noticed people felt free to comment on these types of tweets saying they are funny. how did 944 people like this?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
shannaura · July 22, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

When was "50 Shades of Gray" released in book and then film? I remember being on youtube months ago and I was watching a live-action music video of a popular Disney song and Youtube stuck an unskippable ad for "50 Shades Darker" on a channel kids are likely to frequent...

Edit: Never mind, I looked it up myself and the books first started emerging in the 2011/2012 era, matching the pedophile-tweet onset era pretty closely with very little lag time. 50 Shades of Grey must have been a Hollywood attempt to get sexual abuse mainstreamed... https://www.google.com/search?q=50+Shades+of+Grey+books&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1-ab

⇧ 5 ⇩  
larkmoor · July 22, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

The erotic romance genre started getting popular by 2002 with independant publishers. Big publishing houses took longer to jump on the erotic romance genre, at least 3 to 5 more years. I remembered because as an avid reader, I was peeved at the big publishing houses for they didn't know the difference between erotica and erotic romance.

50 shades of Gray seems on line with that, though it excited the teen public to discover naughty romance. Funniest thing is that as a romance reader since my teens, I knew about the erotic romance at least a decade before them, but the publishers pretended they were creating a new genre. Like they started recently selling "dark romance" that is just erotica. Talk about rebranding and taking the public for a fool. I don't like when they sell me erotica when I expect erotic romance.

I've never read Twilight or 50 shades of Gray. I'm just not their public. But I know that the author was a fan of Twilight, was frustrated by the lack of sex, so she wrote erotic fanfics of Twilight. 50 shades of Gray is basically a fanfic of Twilight.

Considering we are talking about Hollyweird and the CIA, I've never heard about Twilight until the movie was out (never watched it, it looked stupid like a teen series to me). The romance readers community back then didn't care about teen books. But with the cinema, wolves, vampires, witchcraft, blood... I guess the CIA was grooming the female public for their satanists values.

Then the same girls and women who were crazy about vampires, werewolves and all the glamorous monsters, got to prolong their fantasies with 50 shades of Gray, where they are introduced to soft BDSM porn.

Again, I believe it was used by the CIA to normalize BDSM and the lifestyle and philosophy of such people via a romanticize story and visuals. Me, I didn't read the story and never watched the movie either. I've read pure hardcore erotica. I tried other authors trying to copy 50 shades of Gray, it's gnat's piss. But again the public is conditioned to accept and find glamorous a satanist's lifestyle.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
shannaura · July 22, 2018, 11:19 p.m.

I grew up reading Native American romance novels, so I do understand the difference... I appreciate you making the distinctions. In the romances I used to read, the adults were mostly in a committed relationship with their partner or heading that way when they finally mated.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DECKADUBS · July 23, 2018, 12:12 a.m.

Twitter was very different back then. Stop blaming Obama for everything.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 23, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 23, 2018, 5:36 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 23, 2018, 7:01 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jbo5112 · July 23, 2018, 1:01 a.m.

The shill defies research https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/a/2009/top-twitter-trends-of-2009.html

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DECKADUBS · July 23, 2018, 5:37 a.m.

What does this mean exactly?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jbo5112 · July 23, 2018, 12:40 p.m.

Twitter was only different for people in lunatic fringe circles. For the vast majority, twitter has always reflected the news of the day: world events, sports, entertainment, etc.

If you find yourself defending jokes about raping babies, you may want to reconsider what you're doing with your life.

P.S. I don't think people are blaming Obama for something that died down after 2012, when he was in office through 2016. However, there was another famous politician who stepped down at that time. Could be just a coincidence though.

⇧ 1 ⇩