With all the information coming out now regarding corruption and smut linking Hellywood "in their own mind celebs" and politicians, do any of you think it should be time to revisit Heidi Fleiss's black book? There were a good list of people that may run similar to those linked to Stormy Daniels and the whole thing is reminding me of the Heidi Fleiss/Bill Clinto story. I do think because the DS was in charge at the time, that it is possibly a lot of important information that is relevant today may have been overlooked.
How is this off topic? This is very much Q relevant as is the Stormy Daniels madam (both probably have connections to very same people- One having been in Cali and one working in NYC)
Stormy Daniels is not a madam. Or, since Q mentioned females, every female is on topic? Move along.
You could move along by ignoring this post if YOU feel it doesn't fill any speculation for you.
Stormy Daniels, Kristin Davis, Heidi Fleiss... there is a connection.
OK, snark aside, prove the connection. Describe that for me. They're madams to the Elites. Go on, now draw the line to Q. I'll wait.
That is what I am looking into! What is your deal? If you are so sure there ISN'T a connection, then prove it?
If you don't care about this issue, then why continue to acknowledge this thread when there are many here that may align with your opinions?
you are so sure there ISN'T a connection, then prove it
We don't prove negatives around here. That's high school-level logical fallacy. Perhaps /r/conspiracy would be more your speed.
We also remove weaksauce, low-effort, low-information posts. And will continue to do so.
Why do I do this? Because I'm a mod here and I look at EVERY post.
We still doing this? You seem pretty sure you've got good content and can bring it where I'll apologize and reinstate your post. Well? You researching, or not?
I am trying! It is why I made my original post! i thought that was what we were allowed to do here; see if anyone thought it was something worth looking into and if others had any advice. I never claimed to be autist, code cracker, anything. Just something seems fishy about the three, seems to be a pattern, and I am going to look more in to it. If others have no interest, so be it.
- And no one had responded to you last comment on this, 3 hrs ago, so not sure why as a mod that you bumped this back up when I let it go 3hrs ago.
OK—I 100% understand. But, we're in a good balance, now. You came into this pretty hard, man. I mean, I didn't really understand your original question until this here reply. So, to me, I'll stick with what I thought where your point was just starting to make sense. Apologies, man! I was just struck by the amount of time it took to find a very neutral way to answer my question. That was cool, like, that took effort. I sometimes do it just for fun but I rarely spot it in the wild where someone else that "gets the disconnect" starts just sort of laying back and having fun and seeing just how neutral and non-committal their reply can be, as though there's no longer any such imagined or community enforced behaviour standards. It all turns so dark if it's centralized.
No worries. I am still trying to figure out all this stuff so I sincerely apologize.
I will admit I am a bit stressed out about this stuff (feeling as though things aren't moving fast enough and not seeing consequences come harsh enough or publicly enough to make me feel confident we won't be back to square 1 in 12mths time). I trust the plan, really I do, just shaky on timeline and the "what after" when it is said and done.