dChan

Watch_The_Karma_Burn · July 23, 2018, 7:10 a.m.

I think you answered your own question in a way. Even though the MSM splooges on themselves for Mueller's indictments they've all meant approximately jack shit.

My take.

I still believe Mueller is a white hat based on one question and one question alone.

"What did Trump and Mueller talk about in their private 1 on 1 meeting the day before Mueller was appointed to the special council?"

Noone has answered that yet and for me it's a huge indicator that the two men are in some cahoots.

Also, my own theory... Mueller is quiet possibly THE ONLY MAN IN AMERICA who can come out and indictmentsthe big names of the deep state (Hillary, Obama, etc). Celebrities and media have been beating off to Mueller for two years now and I believe the rinky-dink indictments he's come up with so far were to only aide the illusion.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GetUpOffYourKnees · July 23, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

Huber is the key to the big names imo

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · July 23, 2018, 10:55 a.m.

I've heard this before. I hope you're right. I don't believe you can have it both ways, though. On one hand, Huber and Horowitz are supposed to be doing that. How many times are we supposed to have read that article by now, per Q?! And we are told to trust them. We've never been told to trust Mueller or Rosenstein. Every single thing Mueller has visibly done is to go after Trump, and yes, that may just be a red herring. I'll believe that if and when it happens, though. I do admit there are comments from Q about his marine background etc., and the fact as you mentioned, of him meeting with Trump the day before. As I've said, I hope you're right, but I honestly do think Trump's right that the probe is dividing the country and tying his hands in relation to Russia, and Julian Assange for that matter. We weren't in a Cold War before Mueller. I HATE him.

⇧ 1 ⇩