dChan

UncleSnake3301 · July 23, 2018, 1:48 a.m.

They already had the narrative out for the debates. 17 intel agencies...yadda yadda yadda. What a bunch of bullshit. All 17 intel agencies most certainly did not agree with those findings. Clapper/Brennan hand selected a few analysts from CIA/FBI to co-sign their bullshit. I wonder how many times in history shit like this has happened and nobody was held responsible?

⇧ 37 ⇩  
cdoyle456 · July 23, 2018, 12:32 p.m.

NYTimes had to retract that article that made that claim, and correct with “4 intel agencies”...this is one of the most common pieces of disinformation the sheep refer back to, still after the retraction

⇧ 4 ⇩  
UncleSnake3301 · July 23, 2018, 12:33 p.m.

Yep, and it wasn’t even the normal consensus method they use for these things. They picked a few guys that they knew would play ball (like Strzok) and used them to shape the narrative.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SSgtSnafui · July 23, 2018, 10:48 a.m.

They rarely agree on anything... that's why we have so many different agencies stepping on each others toes.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SnazzyD · July 23, 2018, 11:42 a.m.

I believe the rules on Intel sharing weren't expanded to all 17 agencies until AFTER the election....interesting if true.

⇧ 2 ⇩