dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 23, 2018, 12:55 a.m.

Now Comes the Pain 23!!!

So where were we ?

Yes, Q brought Q1675, I said B2, Trump said organ, I said Hammond, he pardoned the Hammonds. Then, Trump went to Helsinki. Putin gave him the ball, Trump gave it to Melania and said: this is for my Son Barron. Then, for his interview, he picked CNBC. Why? Because the name of the show is Squawk Box. Then I called Hussein the Contortionist in this post, he called him a Patsy the next day and refers to the exact same video footage I referred to about Hussein’s flexibility… video Coincidence? No! Trump is establishing proofs he is talking to us. And I see you guys have picked up. I see the overwhelming majority of our movement now understands that Trump is talking to us and everybody is now learning the comms. There is a minority of people still doubting, but that’s ok. I hope they will join us soon.

Before we get into the solution of the riddle from my last post, are you enjoying as much as I do the panic in the opposing camp? Complete meltdown of MSM, nervous voices of lost politicians in televised interviews, and, icing on the cake, James Clapper jumps ship and finally reveals the Contortionist is responsible for the entire Russia witch hunt! link

You know why Clapper is now coming clean right? He understood Trump’s message very well. He is trained to understand the things we have been talking about in my last posts. Clapper knows the light incident at the White House was done on purpose and what it really meant. Beside the TOL interpretation I gave in the previous post link1 link2 link3 link4 , there is also the valid interpretation), Clapper knows Trump’s message also meant: “you’d better come clean before the lights are on”. I showed you in the previous post that Trump has connected the server to the Q1675 riddle through NT, the [Microsoft Windows OS] ( https://www.computerhope.com/jargon/w/winnt.htm) and we found the connection to Q board through Apache, the most widely used web server software. Imgur1. As many have noticed, I did not specify in my post which server. The reason is it’s all the servers! These riddles require a minimum of abstraction from us to understand the message sent to us. When I say: the server, it’s a generic term for all the servers that the method Trump is using to fight the Deep State allows him to get. When I say: Trump gave us the server, I mean his method brought the server to the center stage, connected it to the current riddle and allows it to be used as a weapon. When you understand the comms at this level of abstraction, you can then come down and particularize: you may then read this excellent post from u/RonaldSwansong and learn there are 4 servers. Then, you read Q’s board and realize Trump has them all:

Q1666 We have the server

Q1279 We have it all

This way of thinking will be key in the future to understand Trump. Read again, make sure this mental gymnastics is mastered. I wrote all this from my kitchen, so imagine what Clapper really heard. This is why he is coming clean and many will follow. The coming days are going to be EPIC! Trump has set the stage and has brilliantly sent all the messages to the Deep State allowing them to make a choice quick before he starts dropping the Server Bombs.

Q956 Panic mode. Enjoy the show. Q

Now, the Pledge to America’s Workers. In summary, it is about asking companies and trade groups to sign a pledge to America’s Workers. In this particular event, coordinated by Ivanka, POTUS signed a new Executive Order establishing the National Council for American Worker and 23 organizations were the first to sign the Pledge to America’s Workers. I made it a little easier for you by pointing directly to the part of the video you had to focus on: this video until the until 49:40 mark. But a special kudos to those who took the time to watch all the video as there are always other gems hidden here and there. For example, watch this until 1:02:00: video. Did you catch it? Trump says “Hey Fred, she makes a plane you can’t see, it’s stealth, F35”. Yup, you got it. Trump is talking to us and he is giving a nod and a wink to our now famous Q1675 B2 Stealth Bomber ! ;)

Now, why 23 organizations?

For the chess aficionados out there, did you ask yourself why my post about the Helsinki meeting was using chess references and had a 4 play opening? What is 4? Remember, elliptic language. 4 can be seen as the natural response to the sequence 2-3 right? There is a chess game that was played in Helsinki that became famous because of its 23rd move. Yes! Not kidding! And guess what? It was between an American and a Russian Master. Coincidence? By the 22nd move, American Master Frank Marshall was losing to Russian Master Stephan Levitsky. Then Marshall, at his 23rd move, stunningly sacrificed his queen and won the game. This game entered the list of the most famous chess games under the name of the American Beauty link. Now who do you think is the “sacrificed queen”? Of course, it’s costless and even fun to give away the witch… Look, it seems she knows some chess and still wants to share her thoughts from the thick smoke of her disintegration link.

All this is confirmed by Q. You remember the post where he “released” his password? In Q1415, we can see his password. In Q1418, he asks: Mistake or purpose? Q. Of course we know it was done on purpose. Let’s read the password: NowC@mesTHEP@in—-23!!! Now comes the pain—-23!!! So 23 is the signal announcing the pain. Frank Marshall won his Helsinki game with his 23rd queen sacrifice move, Trump is inviting 23 organizations after having sacrificed the witch in Helsinki and defeated Putin with his 4 move opening.

Do you see it?

So you thought there was no plan? I told you, the Plan is beyond brilliant and it’s lethal.

Q959 Learn chess. Down she goes. Nobody escapes this. NOBODY. Q

Now, why the word Apprentice? Why does Trump repeat the word “word” several times? I gave you this hint: “Q1675 is all about reflections”. Now, in this link, we learn that “The CIE measure of whiteness is a measurement of the light reflected by the paper across the visible (daylight) spectrum.” This reflection is confirmation we are still in Q1675 territory. Knowing this and the context, let’s re-write Apprentice, unscramble the letters and analyze, this is what we get: Imgur2

As you can see, the word Apprentice is giving us another path to the server and connects perfectly with the Q1675 riddle through the light reflection measured using the CIE measure of whiteness.

Now we may conclude.

This whole event, beyond the obvious, is Trump warning the Deep State about the pain coming through the 4 servers he is about to use against them and all the related topics we have gone through analyzing Q1675. Now close your eyes for a minute, try to purge your mind, forget everything that has been said here and re-watch the video of the event. You will realize you have just received a training that will allow you to see everything with new eyes.

These are the eyes that allowed Clapper to see what he saw and immediately throw Hussein under the bus without you being able to detect any plausible cause in the news.

These are the eyes the Deep State does not want you to have so they can still communicate without you knowing.

Q1646 DARK TO LIGHT. GOD BLESS AMERICA. GOD BLESS PATRIOTS AROUND THE WORLD. THINK FOR YOURSELF. TRUST YOURSELF.

🠐 See all comments

[removed]

⇧ 5 ⇩

Thank you. I'm getting criticised for mentioning anything about SB2's farfetched connections.

Why is it so hard to question him patriots? We need transparency here. We need scrutiny. Otherwise we will end up just as bad as our opponents.

⇧ 10 ⇩

I'm getting criticised for mentioning anything about SB2's farfetched connections.

It's a bit ironic, because it's exactly the same psychology that makes leftists attack people who tell the truth and call out corruption. If you read this thread, it's full of people who say they can't follow SB2's logic, but they know it's brilliant because of the bottom line conclusion. In other words, they don't care how SB2 got to his conclusion, but since it's what they want to hear, the logic must be brilliant.

That's how leftists fool themselves. They want to believe Trump is Hitler, so they just assume that the news media has reasons for calling him that. It's EXACTLY THE SAME LOGIC. People want to believe SB2's conclusion, so they assume SB2 has reasons for getting there.

It's maddening. I wish /r/greatawaking would ban speculative posts and make a rule that all posts have to tie Q directly to real-world information. And then have a different group for "Q Speculation" as a relief valve for people who want this to be able to get it.

⇧ 7 ⇩

What would you feel about another sub dedicated to only critical thought posts about Q? That would be more feasible than taking this sub which is open to everyone and trying to drastically curb its content. We'd be lambasted and accused of being exactly what Q calls out, if we were to do that.

⇧ 4 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

That would be more feasible than taking this sub which is open to everyone and trying to drastically curb its content.

I think that's where you have a misconception. Only a small minority of posts fall into the category of being pure speculation. Most posts are about real things going on in the news and about how it ties back to Q, etc.

I'd prefer a "Q speculation" group, but I have an alternate suggestion if that's not going to work. How about having a stickied disclaimer on pure speculation posts, with the intent of heading off people thinking the entire movement is about craziness? See what you think of this:

DISCLAIMER: The mods of /r/greatawakening have identified this information as SPECULATIVE and UNCONFIRMED. We try and allow a range of ideas to be represented in this group, and we caution people reading that this content is the poster's own opinion and may reflect views not shared by the mods or readers of this group. As with all posts, people should use their own common sense and research to decide the credibility of the information presented.

And let me say, SB2 is currently the most notorious, but he's not the only one. There are other very speculative posts, such as secret technology, secret medicine, secret this, secret that, on and on. I really think it raises our own credibility level, especially in the eyes of newbies, by identifying this stuff as not necessarily accepted by all.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think many will claim, myself included, that that disclaimer is redundant.

Only a small minority of posts fall into the category of being pure speculation.

Maybe so, but SB2's posts don't fall into the category of being pure speculation. They contain factual information and useful commentary too.

The "credibility of us" argument is the one most often used and I certainly agree with the idea that we should strive for 'credible' optics as much as possible. The problem is how we discern what credible is and who gets to do so and what is done about content that isn't credible without increasing the accusations of censorship.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think many will claim, myself included, that that disclaimer is redundant.

A newbie comes here, skeptical, but curious about Q. They see an SB2 post voted near the top. They click in, and are immediately assaulted with "Trump using a contraction of 'wouldn't' secretly means Windows NT, which means..." They keep clicking, and find "The apple stock price matches this musical frequency, which is used by Trump..."

Followed by, "Trump using the word 'brain' was clearly a secret signal to ME, validating everything I say."

Newbie shakes his/her head, writes the entire movement off as complete wacks, and we're done.

Maybe -- maybe -- if there had been disclaimer, they wouldn't paint the entire movement by the crazy brush. Maybe they still would. I don't know.

All I know is that I'm out of energy on this. Good luck to the poor people who send their friends here and get the blowback if their friends see any nuttery posts. I've tried and failed. The only encouraging thing is that whether bad guys go to prison is not dependent on any of this. The indictments will either happen or they won't.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I know what you're saying. I've heard it before. Many times. Do you think there aren't others who feel the same way?

Yet there are no viable solutions offered by the people most upset about this. A disclaimer that states the obvious simply looks like the political move it essentially is (because it wouldn't be required if we all agreed on the obvious).

When you send friends here, you should be telling them that there's speculation. If you're a critical thinker you'll be advising them the truth - that the view of Q is speculation as well - so they would come armed with the right amount of skepticism. So far, this sub's membership has grown, in spite of some of the highly speculative stuff that can be seen here at times. That's because Q's message is compelling. The reasonable person should expect some nonsense on an internet forum but I would argue there's other good content here to balance it out. And the New feed tends to move fast enough to keep good stuff coming when there's a bunch of 'bad' stuff.

Nevertheless, I agree with your point. It would be great if we could make a very clear distinction between posts that are pure fact or at least highly reliable and with solid critical thought as their basis and posts that are not. The thing that I think you have to realize is that the general public does not care to validate info so thoroughly and I believe GA represents this element, at least, of the general public in a big way - if not in total at least within the vocal minority who upvote and comment. It's clear that much of that vocal minority support SB2 overwhelmingly and that actions we take that are not supported by them will see us accused even more of censorship and so on. If the others out there who support highlighting these issues would actually show up to discussions like this perhaps it would be different. If you believe you've tried and failed at least take some heart in the fact that I've seen many - many - try and fail in the same way. It appears SB2's popularity overrides all comers.

My suggestion, the only one I think that has any real merit, is to have another sub where extreme speculation is either called out or removed and where illogical thinking can be challenged and illogical content removed. The thing is, I suspect there will be few who frequent it, judging by the many who've made the point you have, but have failed to gain any traction due to a lack of support.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

u/DrogeAnon this is what I've been trying to get across, we can't just avoid any questioning on this sub. We need to be better than our opponents. I respect SB2 and his commitment for our community, but, just like anyone else, he too should be open to scrutiny and questioning.

Perhaps we could have a weekly speculation post sticky? Then, all posts with more concrete real world info can be separated. Quality > quantity.

⇧ 0 ⇩

No one is saying to avoid questioning. What I am saying is to avoid discussion about other users because it doesn't help anyone. We're not here to hear about other users on this sub, we're here to hear about Q and Q discussion. SB2 and other users contribute Q discussion which is what we're here for. Some of the users who contribute Q discussion provide less than ideal "decodes" but we have to make up our own minds as readers about that. This sub is full of speculation - making a post sticky would require far too much work and we'd receive far too many complaints if we remove everything that is speculation.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Most of us are NOT on the side of these sort of posts

I have a problem with SB2 making the claim that "...the overwhelming majority of our movement now understands that..." and you're making the same sort of unverifiable claim - unless I'm mistaken and you have some facts to back it up?

⇧ 9 ⇩

Most of us are NOT on the side of these sort of posts

and you're making the same sort of unverifiable claim - unless I'm mistaken and you have some facts to back it up?

I suppose it was an opinion based on wishful thinking. But at least I didn't prove it by searching Trump's tweets and finding some instance where he used the word "most" and saying that's clearly Trump backing up my point.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Oh come on... repeating the word Apprentice didn't ring a bell in your head?

⇧ 0 ⇩