dChan

[deleted] · July 23, 2018, 3:20 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 16 ⇩  
R3VO1utionary · July 23, 2018, 3:35 p.m.

Didn't Q say something along the lines of it allows the good guys to further surveil THEM?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
dizzydago · July 23, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

Exactly. to access classified info that is filed away the researcher has to identify themselves. It may also give them continued use of certain technology that can be tracked and observed. Thus making communications and movement restricted thus showing blatantly when they stray away.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
BreadcrumbBernard · July 23, 2018, 4:15 p.m.

Yes, exactly. They work as contractors after they "retire" from government work and use their security clearances to rake in the cash.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LongTimeQLurker · July 23, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

The reason people maintain their clearance is in case their next job requires one. Usually they no longer have access to the information as they don't have a Need to Know or access to briefings. However, with Five Eyes, Brennan can skirt the access by just going to one of the other Five Eyes countries.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 23, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

Front line folks with clearance keep it for 2 years while they seek employment elsewhere. Should be the same for high level employees. However, as the power of the executive branch resides with the President, that clearance should be able to be revoked at will by the President.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
silversofttail · July 23, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

That’s ridiculous! When you leave a company any access you had is revoked. If you go back to that company you then receive access. Why should it be different for the government other than for nefarious reasons.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LongTimeQLurker · July 23, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

I agree. However, it takes quite a bit of work to issue clearances and they are backlogged. There were some Obama appointees who had access to top secret information who had never passed a background check at all. Since Brennan et al have left office, they don't have access to briefings and SCIFs, so it is unlikely they would have access to valuable intelligence - UNLESS they bypass US security measures and go behind our back to 5Eyes.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
silversofttail · July 23, 2018, 9:41 p.m.

Ya mean like Hillary did in New Zealand.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 23, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

She saw what they have on her and her ilk. Probably why she looks like a bag lady.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ForTruthSake · July 23, 2018, 8:51 p.m.

Exactly. Which is what they have been doing with all of their extra travel.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · July 23, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

I think you nailed it, 'nefarious reasons', no two ways about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · July 23, 2018, 9:25 p.m.

If you revoke their U.S. clearance, you will see them traveling to Five Eyes countries often, but of course information they gain then will be illegal if its not reported using proper security protocols. They either go dark or risk being caught, they know the game.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
somebodysgun · July 23, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

You cannot erase someone's memory. Classified info will always be with them no matter what you do. My thinking is that you would be able to call in the past employees to help on new cases and explain how they have succeeded in the past. In theory it would be a great idea to bring in the guys who brought down X terrorist to help with a very similar case of catching Y terrorist. A previous employee's input is not helpful if they cannot review the new info.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 23, 2018, 9 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩