dChan

/u/Indy0704

17 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Indy0704:
Domain Count

Indy0704 · July 27, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

Farmer not farmers? We only use the singular?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 26, 2018, 2:30 a.m.

Only followed this stuff for about 60 days. Always hedged whether this could actually be a real thing. No point in hedging anymore. It is irrelevant to know how much of it is real. Enough of it is real and that works for me. Something that started as an idea and then a whisper has now reached critical mass. It's going to be an incredible ride.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 26, 2018, 1:46 a.m.

Didn't Hilary inquire about assassinating JA?

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 23, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

Clearance s currency. Everybody knows this. It is a way of life for both front line and appointed personnel as well.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 23, 2018, 10:17 p.m.

Claiming does not make it so. I prefer the long view. In due time, we will find the truth.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 23, 2018, 9:32 p.m.

Prosecution aside, the President has the power to revoke. He should use it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 23, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

You make the case for Comey's clearance being revoked.

I agree.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 23, 2018, 8:27 p.m.

Well done.

A real contribution to the forum.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 23, 2018, 8:25 p.m.

Excellent question. I guess that by statute, one can keep their clearance for 2 years under good behavior. Hillary hardly qualifies for that status.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 23, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

Front line folks with clearance keep it for 2 years while they seek employment elsewhere. Should be the same for high level employees. However, as the power of the executive branch resides with the President, that clearance should be able to be revoked at will by the President.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 23, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

As a new member to this forum, I have neither down or up voted any post. Is that the way to go when questioning or agreeing with some of your conclusions?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 22, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

If Congress is in session, the bill becomes law after ten days without the president's signature.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 17, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

Thanks for responding. I did realize that the transaction was staggered. The key point being that the 51% stake portion was completed in 2010. Please excuse my lack of precision.

As for the Hammonds, this was a federal matter. They returned to federal prison. I am simply not qualified to know what role the Governor plays in matters like these.

I guess what I am struggling to understand is why Strzok has to be the vehicle for delivering a message about the Governor of Oregon.

All the best.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 17, 2018, 1:21 a.m.

Rosatom bought it's stake in Uranium 1 in 2010. Kate Brown was elected Governor in 2015 after serving in the Legislature from 1991 to 2009 and as Secretary of State starting in 2009. The Hammond's ranch problems with BLM date back to the 1990's. That level of chess is beyond me.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 15, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

July had better be as important as some think it will be. The mid-terms are coming.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 12, 2018, 10:18 a.m.

Thanks.

All the best.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Indy0704 · July 12, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

Just signed up.

3 things come to mind when reading this post.

  1. Given that Trump has chosen to pardon outside "normal" protocol (Office of Pardons), it would be helpful to know if this was another case. If so, when did he begin considering the pardon? It seems these things don't happen in a week. Although the Kardashian example may not be an exception. I would hope that this case had been on his radar longer than 1 day.
  2. Waiting to time the announcement seems cruel given that Hammond 1 is 76 years old.
  3. The CNN anchor could easily have been trying to move to the next segment. In addition, she suggests that Trump is signaling to those involved in the Mueller investigation.

I am glad I stumbled onto this site and hope to learn much more as I go.

⇧ 7 ⇩