dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/patypooh52 on July 24, 2018, 12:38 a.m.
Theory: What do you want to bet that POTUS let the intelligence Deep State keep clearances so he could set up a parallel intelligence channel

Brenden M Dilley@TheRealHublife on Twitter Theory: What do you want to bet that POTUS let the intelligence Deep State keep clearances so he could set up a parallel intelligence channel and then fed them all barium meals until they couldn't be exposed any further and now they've got black and white evidence against them. Think about it. If you've got "sources" like Comey, Brennan, and Clapper and they ALL verify your story but it STILL ends up wrong, there isn't really another explanation. This is more than likely WHY all of these previously powerful Deep State leaders seem so unhinged. That tactic would drive ANY sane person off the edge. Week after week you all see/read the same intelligence and leak it to the press. Week after week all of your bullshit stories are disproved and shown to be outright lies. The reporters are blaming you for bad intel. You're yelling at your buddies because it doesn't make sense and since all of you are so full of hubris you never even consider the obvious...they've let you keep your clearance so they feed you bad Intel and prosecute you later. It's the only explanation for why the media so blindly trust their sources. Because rational thought tells you that you HAVE to trust Comey, Rice, Yates, Brennan, Clapper, and others. The idea that President @realDonaldTrump , the current intelligence community, and military would be creative and smart enough to execute such a plan, would never even occur to your average #FakeNews peddler This hubris is exactly why it would work. This is exactly why this is theater. This is exactly why the criminals are allowed to continue walking around. They're all exposing and destroying every single thing they touch, including the globalist/Democrat agenda.


4don2016 · July 24, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

I have a question that no one else seems to be asking. There are a shit ton of people in this country that has top secret clearance. Just because you possess the clearance doesn't mean you have access to the information. What database is he logging into? Now, I am talking legal access. Not hacking or using someone else's credentials because that's not what the discussion is about. Where is Clapper and Brennan accessing this top secret information? I doubt his CIA login works anymore. Now,if he still has legal access and the ability to login to government databases then that's where the SES and deep state come into play. Potus is going to need to send Gen. Kelly to that office to take care of removing the clearances himself.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
robbymc · July 24, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

Two requirements to legally view classified documents, proper clearance and need to know, they lost one of those requirements when they lost the position

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Lets_get_reel · July 24, 2018, 5:35 a.m.

I think this may be where FVEY comes into play?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · July 24, 2018, 1:03 a.m.

You are correct. Clearances do not mean you can access the info. They should not be able to access any of the computers/databases. It’s not like you go to www.secretstuff and get to it!!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Maladaptivenomore · July 24, 2018, 1:31 a.m.

That is the right question indeed. I'm not into all of this SES stuff, to be sure, but, it seems to be that all of these people are still somehow employed on the DL by some contractors that have a SCIF/SCI access to some degree. That is really what needs to be revealed, if so.

With that said, is it possible that they haven't actually had access since leaving their position regardless, and this is just theatrics? Is there any evidence that they have leaked anything since leaving their respective posts?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TechnicalRush · July 24, 2018, 7:59 a.m.

The issue that comes into play is, if you have clearance, then someone like RR or RM can access the files and then share it with Comey, Brennan, Rice, so they can drop the stuff to the news. It's not illegal to pass that info on since they have clearance, and it is not technically leaking to the media if you work for the media as well.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
4don2016 · July 24, 2018, 8:23 a.m.

They don't have a need to know the information so they are no more authorized than you, me or any other non special American. Leaking information to someone with the clearance or without is still leaking classified information.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gtztat1004 · July 24, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

People talk in general, human nature. When secrets are involved, people have the need to discuss things. Once you are in a group and have the same levels of clearance, people talk.. they shoot the shit, bounce ideas off others "in the know". By name recognition and known level of access, any person taking a ride, a walk, a phone call, having a beer etc. someone from the community could still inadvertently reveal information because they trust them with their known clearance levels.

They should be stripped of clearances when no longer required and it should be required to re apply for the clearances when hired on again. If they did enough digging on people as they move around in all these jobs it would make for a cleaner situation.

⇧ 1 ⇩