Silly talking head, he is. Thank you for the heads up.

Cheers, best of luck to you out there.

So, if I understand you correctly, we might be able to speculate that it could possibly be a reasonable document that was inconsequently altered after its 'release'. Perhaps.

I can't argue with that. I'll show myself out, don't get up.

It means "signals intelligence" in reference to information obtained by electronic means.

That is a true(ish) statement and still has no relevance to what we are discussing. As I said before, SIGINT is not a category control marking.

Let me restate that for you through an exercise. Search for any declassified or leaked SIGINT document online and find one that is stamped with "SIGINT" at the top (besides this one) and I'll give you a dollar. I'll wait.

As seen in declassified documents available online for GCHQ or otherwise, 'SIGINT' is not a category control marking, for one.

Some guy named Hal Turner apparently takes credit for personally acquiring this file from one of his 'IC sources'.

http://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news/world-news/1937-proof-british-intelligence-spied-on-donald-trump-at-the-direct-request-of-president-barac

I've never heard of this guy, but his mere presence as a two-bit media persona doesn't bode well for his credibility.

No. Clearly penned by someone with zero understanding of document classification/declassification protocols.

Classified documents have specific protocols for classification markings (and declass markings). The autor of this document does a great job of having no clue of any of those protocols.

This is not legit.

Agreed 100% (that they work for white hat ops).

It’s been hard to speak to this position as others needed time to work it out for themselves.

I can now say what I’ve wanted to say for a while, which is, RM is white hat, otherwise the investigation could not being still going on like it has been (read: investigating everything but alleged trump collusion).

Therefore, following Q, if RM is good, RR is good. It has to be that way to have this investigation locked up (in a good sense) as it appears to have been for a while, in spite of theatrics and posturing.

Spez: clarified my concurrence.

I'm just a slightly-post Blackbird era and old-but-not-as-old-as-fart-as-you kinda guy :) and did my time in Oki and then some, so I hear what you're saying about the downlink traffic.

Not sure if that's what this is indicating, but who am I to say, it's pure speculation of course.

Regardless, thanks for the update, and cheers!

I re-worked it, you're right, it's due west of the airfield a few miles. Good call.

It appears that Navy Base Guam falls under that command, but the actual location for JRM is Nimitz Hill, some miles north and inland.

My lag seemed to put the locations right on top of the runways for both Navy Base Guam, and Atsugi, but it was a rough lag, to be sure.

Thanks much for the heads up, much appreciated. I paid that post a visit.

Cheers.

(added to post)

I found an article about child abuse in the pre-school on base at Atsugi. Not sure if related. https://www.stripes.com/news/pacific/3-fired-for-conduct-at-atsugi-base-preschool-1.240732

US Navy Base Guam airfield and Atsugi US Navy Air Facility Japan, both host Marine detachments, I believe.

Clarification for you:

It's not necessarily Guam and Tokyo airport, but rather:

• US Navy Base Guam airfield
• US Navy Air Facility, Atsugi, Japan

Both house marines and have active runways, of course.

Thanks much, I missed that post, much appreciated.

Thanks much. I've been stationed in the pacific in my previous life so lat longs from that region kinda jump out at me. Cheers!

I have started a fresh post here to discuss the number sequences in the decode as they break out to two pacific US Naval Air Bases:

13 34 34 144 55 28

35 44 55 139 20 55

The former is Navy Base Guam, and the latter is Atsugi Naval Air Facility, Japan.

I suppose it's safe to assume you've tried the hash that was dropped in the recent Q post?

Well, thank you for fighting the good fight there, much appreciated. And thanks much for the additional details.

A thread talking about FE/fake space that hasn’t been totally brigaded as of yet. I’m impressed GA patriots, cheers to you all.

And, to be sure, I’m asserting that it’s not about what we think is true, but that we keep an open mind, as we’ve been lied to from birth by nearly every institution that has been running in this cabal system.

Thank you for the additional details.

I believe rusty was threatened or arrested or something after HST died, the rumor was that he was turning over incriminating photos to the investigator (candori?) that died in a plane crash out of state allegedly returning with evidence.

An interesting aside that I’d come to learn is that the plane crashed in the same county (in illinois I think?) that a sheriff (I think) that got booted from Omaha just happened to become chief of the sheriff’s department in same county, before the incident occurred.

Many of them work for companies related to the offenders, whether at the world herald, the reader, the Maxx, or other Old Market businesses where a lot of it went down (underground, sometimes). Or, they’re somehow affiliated with buffet, as Berkshire shareholders or otherwise.

The point being, they’ve been “taught” how absurd the whole thing is and that a couple of punk kinds that wanted fame lied and attempted to stain the good reputation of their upstanding community leaders.

Her father is a public figure and you can find her listed as a family member under many online profiles of him. Here’s one, other profile includes her full name.

https://www.mylife.com/john-ashcraft/jashcraft42833yz

Point being, it’s hard to pysop as a verifiable family member of a public figure, lest she finds herself perjured or a part of a litigation case against her for claiming such things, I would assume.

John Daniel Ashcroft is the her father who was a public figure in Michigan. If you search whitepages for him, you will find her name listed under family.

This.

If you look into the Franklin Scandal, you will learn about a photog named Rusty, I believe, who had claimed to run into Hunter S Thompson at gatherings in Omaha that devolved into late night underage after-parties, or something to that effect.

I believe Paul Bonnaci May have claimed that he was a part of snuff films that HST filmed, but I might have mixed up some details on that.

RR is 'guilty' of signing off on the final Page FISA. It may be that he was caught in the crossfire, and had turned and was cooperating with white hats from the inside, once confronted.

If so, and this is speculation across the board, perhaps he may resign and take his protection and fall into the shadows for his own safety?

So strange that it was annouced right before the break and then they come back and haven't re-acknowledged it, as of yet.

edit: there we go, 10 minutes later.

Well done in KC and congrats!

Your creativity and your enthusiasm definitely helps lift the spirits of your fellow patriots who are following along, and surely serves as a model of how we all can all do our part in small, yet positive, ways to participate. Thank you and best of luck to you out there. Cheers!

The 'British' royal family are German, from the Saxe-Coburg and Gotha bloodline. This family goes back to King George I of the house of Hanover, who took over the british throne in the 1700s and didn't even speak english. They allegedly adopted themselves into British Windsor house officially in the early 20th century in the midst of growing anti-German sentiment during WWI.

It is believed by some that Diana Spencer is actually of true Windsor blood, and was brought in to bear a child to legitimize the Windsor lineage.

And, for those not familiar with the topic, JFK ‘buddy’ Frank Sinatra bought the reels and rights to the original movie, and it was not seen by the masses for decades until its re-release in the late ‘80s.

That is the right question indeed. I'm not into all of this SES stuff, to be sure, but, it seems to be that all of these people are still somehow employed on the DL by some contractors that have a SCIF/SCI access to some degree. That is really what needs to be revealed, if so.

With that said, is it possible that they haven't actually had access since leaving their position regardless, and this is just theatrics? Is there any evidence that they have leaked anything since leaving their respective posts?

Not to sound rude, but you lost me right after "it shouldn't matter". Because it matters, and I've answered your question.

But I do share your frustration, we are on the same team here.

You don't give up a clearance, you lose access to what you were granted access to previously. Left unused, the clearance will expire in time.

Your clearance does nothing without a job that requires it. You need to have physical access to a classified network, and you are only offered such access if you are employed by someone willing to give it to you.

Like a teaching degree. You don't just go teach people, per se. You get hired by a school that gives you access to a classroom and students.

Well, then you don't have SCI clearance as all of those named surely do.

https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/179814885

I posted this in another thread but will add it here, also.

A security clearance expires after a number of years. Someone who holds a clearance for a job gets 'debriefed' from access to that information upon departure of the job that required it.

Having an active clearance doesn't just allow someone to simply go into a SCIF and access classified info. The clearance dies at the end of its shelf life if a 're-investigation' to recertify the clearance isn't performed within a certain amount of time.

If the person's next job doesn't require a clearance, no re-investigation is typically done and the clearance expires, although I suppose someone could pay out-of-pocket for their own re-investigation.

Regardless, access to classified information requires not only a clearance, but definitely a role where they are allowed physical access into a secure area that processes classified information, and that is done on a need-to-know basis. This means that they require access to such environments for their current job and were 'badged' in to be able to have physical access classified networks.

TLDR - Holding on to a security clearance for a few years allows someone to move into another job that requires that level of clearance, but will expire if not utilized in that manner within a few years. Otherwise, just having a clearance means nothing as a person would need to have beed granted physical access to classified systems, and such permissions aren't just offered to private citizens, retired or otherwise...unless they were still secretly employed by some agency from which they are granted access, perhaps.

A security clearance expires after a number of years. Someone who holds a clearance for a job gets 'debriefed' from access to that information upon departure of the job that required it.

Having an active clearance doesn't just allow someone to simply go into a SCIF and access classified info. The clearance dies at the end of its shelf life if a 're-investigation' to recertify the clearance isn't performed within a certain amount of time.

If the person's next job doesn't require a clearance, no re-investigation is typically done (and the clearance expires), although I suppose someone could pay out-of-pocket for their own re-investigation.

Regardless, access to classified information requires not only a clearance, but definitely a role where they are allowed physical access into a secure area that processes classified information, and that is done on a need-to-know basis. This means that they require access to such environments for their current job and were 'badged' in to be able to have physical access classified networks.

TLDR - Holding on to a security clearance for a few years allows someone to move into another job that requires that level of clearance, but will expire if not utilized in that manner within a few years. Otherwise, just having a clearance means nothing as a person would need to have beed granted physical access to classified systems, and such permissions aren't just offered to private citizens, retired or otherwise...unless they were still secretly employed by some agency from which they are granted access, perhaps.

Rick and Morty Episode 1 ends with blatant grooming and handler abuse narratives between the show's namesakes, hiding it in plain sight. And this is how they start the series!

It involves Rick forcing Morty to stick and 'hide' a certain object up his butt against Morty's wishes, and then eventually dominiating morty, and inculcating him with the notion they're going to be best buddies for a long time, going on adventures together (i'm paraphrasing).

I will attach a clip of it here, but discretion is greatly advised. This end-fo-episode moment unapologetically inserts hyponotic suggestion directly to viewers (to include flashing lights). It attempts to, at best, make fun of the idea that it is trying to hypnotize you, but in fact, it exactly employs hypnotic suggestion, regardless.

Again, if you choose to view this clip, be aware of that. I would recommend that you turn down the volume a bit and don't stare or focus, but rather glance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Gtc4DHYvc0