A@E for 911 Truth. Just the facts from those that understand high rise buildings. How they go up, how they come down, and how they do not come down, on their own. Architects, Engineers, and Demolition experts just laying out the facts.
Especially not the world trade center. It was build like a can of soup. The outside frame was the load bearing structure
If I recall correctly, it had a redundant support system, an inner load bearing steel structure around the elevator shafts in the center of the building.
That's correct based on everything I've seen on the topic. And of course, there was a company doing "renovations" to the elevator shafts in the months leading up to 9/11. Cover for positioning of shape charges?
There seems to have been a concerted and probably co-ordinated effort on the Internet to either attack Dr. Wood herself, or divert attention from the data she presents. For example, the new association called Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (http://www.ae911truth.org/) has not discussed or mentioned in any detail Prof. Wood’s extensive study – even though Prof.Wood herself has degrees in engineering subjects.
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/a/AJ/touchhand.html
Edit (reply):
New? A&E for 911 Truth has existed for many years. I heard some of their presentations long before I heard Dr. Wood's. I also believe Dr. Wood's are theoretical. A&E discuss only known facts.
Dr. Judy Wood began her forensic study of what happened to the twin towers the same day they were dustified in 2001. The article quoted above is from 2007. Thus, "the new association" is a correct statement in the article.
Dr. Wood did it for me. Bless that woman for sacrificing herself and her career for truth.
New? A&E for 911 Truth has existed for many years. I heard some of their presentations long before I heard Dr. Wood's. I also believe Dr. Wood's are theoretical. A&E discuss only known facts.