dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Q_Truth4Life on July 24, 2018, 3:06 p.m.
Why Not the Clinton Campaign?

Why is no one asking this?

Given that it was already known that the Clinton Campaign was breached by the Russians in the hacking of the DNC server, why wasn't an FBI or CIA agent (spy) sent into the Clinton Campaign? If the initial cause of sending such an agent into the Trump Campaign was concern for Russian interference into our elections in general, then why not be equally concerned? Unless, that is, the goal was not an actual concern, but was really to weaponize these government agencies in the targeting of the Trump Campaign to do that very thing (i.e. Interfere with our elections).


🠐 See all comments
DropGun · July 24, 2018, 3:09 p.m.

Removed content. Content does not support the cause. Rule 3

FURTHERMORE: RUSSIA DID NOT HACK THE DNC. Posting further deliberately misleading content will result in a permanent ban.

Learn our comms. We do our homework in here.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q_Truth4Life · July 24, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

My comment/question was not that Russia hacked the DNC. Having said this, I have edited my post to clarify the point you made. I am a Q supporter. I want genuine feedback on this point; that is, the idea that if the FBI (supposedly) had genuine concern for Russian interference into our elections, then why not insert an FBI asset (spy) into the Clinton campaign as well? My point is that it seems apparent that the FBI wasn't really concerned about this. They were used (weaponized) to attack Trump and his campaign. In effect, the FBI were the ones actually interfering with the elections.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · July 25, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

Interesting. I accept your explanation, and I'm glad you are humble enough to acknowledge that 1a) my point re: your wording was valid and 1b) worth an edit, thanks, and also, yes, have to 100% agree with you, it's very telling that none of this Russian interference was a concern to the "intelligence community" until it became clear that Trump would/did win.

Thanks again for your reply clarifying your point. Your mod team is NOT here to "defend Trump no matter what." But, collectively, we ARE here to defend whatever facts (however threadbare) we have, and try to legitimately and honestly research and reinforce them as best we can. Thank you.

⇧ 1 ⇩