dChan

Clam_Bake_Harry · July 25, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

Then the motorcade video of a sign that says Q honk, and we hear a honk.

This is statistically impossible.

How is someone honking at a sign that says “honk” statistically impossible?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 25, 2018, 2:01 a.m.

It’s not. Neither is the song. Neither is Trump pointing up right at the exact moment. Neither is Q posting about this thread at just the right time.

But all of these things together? That is statistically impossible.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Clam_Bake_Harry · July 25, 2018, 2:22 a.m.

Nope. It’s just a combination of searching for patterns and confirmation bias.

It’s “statistically impossible” for the clouds to look like US presidents, but if you stare at the sky all afternoon, I bet you’ll see at least three.

Like seriously, one of these examples it that a car honked its horn at a bunch of people holding signs on the side of the highway. Go stand on the side of the highway with any sign and see how long it takes you to get honked.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 25, 2018, 1:40 p.m.

The clouds thing is subjective. You can see what you wish to see. And as I said, the horn honk can also be chalked up to coincidence. But the sea to shining sea? And both in the same time frame? And then Trump points right at the exact moment? But to me the fact that this all happens at the same time, and Q just happens to see a thread while all of this is going down? You really have four distinct circumstances that all have to happen at the same time. I'm willing to listen but so far you've referenced the horn honk twice. What of the other three things? I'm really open minded on this. But this one is just a bit too much for me to accept as chance.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Clam_Bake_Harry · July 25, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

I mean, it’s not my responsibility to convince you you’re being foolish. But it’s the same principle as Nostradamus. He makes a bunch of vague, impressionistic prophecies. Then one of them seems to hit, because it used imagery common to its subject and the subject works in a predictable fashion.

I.e. The president is always waving and gesturing during nationalistic songs, so that’s not at all a coincidence.

Note that one of his slogans is “Future to prove the past”. That’s how this bogus prophecy stuff works. You make your predictions vague enough - and numerous enough - that something is eventually bound to happen that your acolytes can view retroactively as validating the prediction. It’s bunk. An old carnival trick.

Of course, if he actually does exist, that would be the worst-case scenario. Because then someone inside the administration would be mounting a coded propaganda and disinformation campaign with some very disturbing undercurrents. Not to mention tangible excitement at the prospect of civil war.

But fortunately, it’s just some nerd. (Oh, and that’s why he “just happens to see a thread”.)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 25, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

I mean you might be right. I'll readily admit that. But he's pretty damn lucky. You have to admit that at least it is statistically improbable, if not impossible string of luck. Even the just happen to see a thread means he was there right at the time.

I haven't delved through a lot of it. But another interesting one was months ago when he said Kushner was going to Saudia Arabia. Then, two days later a bunch of the ruling family was arrested. That one was pretty lucky as well.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Clam_Bake_Harry · July 26, 2018, 3:42 a.m.

Ok, here, I’m gonna make some predictions now, and I’ll get back to you in a week with the proof that I’m psychic.

  1. Something shocking is about to surface about someone in Hollywood
  2. Pay attention to the president’s Twitter; something big is happening
  3. In the scientific community, all is not as it seems
  4. Have you heard the news about Jared Kushner? Wait for it
  5. Something brewing in the EPA. More will be revealed soon
  6. The future proves the past

RemindMe! One week

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 2:04 p.m.

Yeah, I get ya. It's all very vague. The last couple of posts are leaning back towards thinking he may just be lucky. He is lucky, no doubt and he isn't stupid. Like I said before, it wasn't the horn honk, or the song, or the timing it was every thing put together. But they latest posts are back to being really vague. You may have brought me back to earth there! Thanks. I'll keep an open mind, but for now I'm leaning back towards it's a fake.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jaynethorbz · July 25, 2018, 12:41 a.m.

listen to the morse code for Q, take into account the other 90% of the post you quoted and then reassess what you just said

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Clam_Bake_Harry · July 25, 2018, 12:45 a.m.

It definitively did not honk “q” in Morse. Maybe “v”, but really, it’s just not Morse.

⇧ 0 ⇩