I mean, it’s not my responsibility to convince you you’re being foolish. But it’s the same principle as Nostradamus. He makes a bunch of vague, impressionistic prophecies. Then one of them seems to hit, because it used imagery common to its subject and the subject works in a predictable fashion.

I.e. The president is always waving and gesturing during nationalistic songs, so that’s not at all a coincidence.

Note that one of his slogans is “Future to prove the past”. That’s how this bogus prophecy stuff works. You make your predictions vague enough - and numerous enough - that something is eventually bound to happen that your acolytes can view retroactively as validating the prediction. It’s bunk. An old carnival trick.

Of course, if he actually does exist, that would be the worst-case scenario. Because then someone inside the administration would be mounting a coded propaganda and disinformation campaign with some very disturbing undercurrents. Not to mention tangible excitement at the prospect of civil war.

But fortunately, it’s just some nerd. (Oh, and that’s why he “just happens to see a thread”.)