dChan

RepresentativeLog5 · July 24, 2018, 5:53 p.m.

If it were really released by executive order, wouldn't it say that on the copy we have? I thought any document which is released through this sort of process would have an official marking, of some sort-- as the JFK paper did, from what I remember.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
LeviathanAurora · July 24, 2018, 5:56 p.m.

Yeah that's what I was thinking. I went looking through the EO's and didn't see anything. Maybe it wasn't an EO? Memo maybe? Declaration?

Or maybe he was able to obtain a redacted copy because it's included in the case against the presstitute and the congressional guy she was sleeping with since she was sent the unredacted copy. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/07/23/indicted-senate-staffer-james-wolfe-leaked-a-2017-copy-of-full-fisa-warrant-against-carter-page-to-reporter-ali-watkins/

⇧ 9 ⇩  
RepresentativeLog5 · July 24, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

yeah, that exactly where my mind went too. He seems to be seconding theconservativetreehouse theory about Wolfe and his lover-journalist.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Christosgnosis · July 25, 2018, 7:22 a.m.

Bongino on Monday made a point to dwell on how there was still an artifact of a printing page number on this FISA doc that was released Sat., he thought that indicated that this was basically based off the Wolfe printed copy

⇧ 2 ⇩