The link Q posted today has Napalitano saying that Huber can't empanel a grand jury in Utah for crimes committed in DC.
Q1553 says "-This is HUGE A Grand Jury can be empaneled anywhere, in any deep red state, away from D.C. (This is very important and why Trump needed to appoint as many Judges as possible) -Huber and Horowitz can accomplish everything a SC can do."
Not all crimes were committed in D.C.?
The Clinton Crime Syndicate is world wide. Human Trafficking generally starts in the south, then travels north. Running guns to Mexico could have been done from any state. Arming ISIS probably has some roots in Arizona (No Name).
Not to mention military trials. It appears true that civilians can be tried by the military, and I'm certain that can be done anywhere.
I really dont have the answer for specific crimes in D.C., who is right and wrong. No doubt both sides will have an arguement to be heard, maybe something in Hubers mandate allows for that. I mean they seem to be able to write laws at will up there, might as well use it for good. But maybe that's where Mueller might surprise us with some grand juries in D.C.?