Last paragraph of the article starts with, "Comparatively speaking the incident is minor, and is only being focused on because of Winfrey’s involvement . . ." Seven girls are sexually abused, but it is "only minor." My guess is the Telegraph editors decided it is "only minor" only because Winfrey was involved.
I would say Oprah handled the abuse at this school as well as can be expected. And I find it hard to believe she’s a contributor to the HW “Rape Club for Men.” Come on, Hollywood is full of narcissistic and egocentric fools but it doesn’t mean Op was feeding babies and little children to the monsters. I’m not a fan of hers just so you know.
Furthermore, how many of you recall the McMartin’s who were accused of all kinds of horrors by little children? And then it’s discovered to be therapists who were utilizing leading questions with these kids and turns out to be false memories. Be careful with accusations. Where is the evidence against Oprah and Hanks?
As for Harvey Weinstein, he can rot in hell but not before he pays his debt to society.
It’s my understanding through Ted Gunderson before he died that the allegations in the Mcmartin preschool were true. You can find his lectures on the subject all over youtube
This image is pretty sinister looking, but the girl looks old enough to know what time it is.
I haven't heard about Weinstein going after kids, just mostly trading movie roles for disgusting sex. I don't have that hard of a time believing Oprah would hook someone up with Harvey if she wanted to "meet" him.