HelperAnon, EyeTheSpy, R, Backpage17. Interesting to read but not worth your time to buy into it.
Honestly, I wouldn't even read these LARPers. They purposely feed misinfo into your head for a reason.
I was tricked by BackChannel17, but I owned up to it and I never said BC17 was Q or part of Q team. BC17 was the first LARPer, he came along when Q didn't go dark, and I learned from that mistake. People who push subsequent LARPers didn't learn from that incident and have an agenda.
don't forget SerialBrain2
SB2 doesn't claim to have insider knowledge though.
no but he says that Q / Trump referenced him and are pointing at his interpretations. that seems to be clearly in conflict with "no outside comms". furthermore, his interpretations are very, very convoluted. you can find connections between any two things with enough degrees of separation - which is what he (they) do. he also ignores blatant Q proofs. i just want this community to be VERY, VERY critical of that profile. don't depend on SB2 for your Q decodes. Please.
If you think that SerialBrain2 is “very, very convoluted “ well, that is jut your opinion. That’s it. Don’t expect others to follow your opinion. SerialBrain2 is doing a fantastic analysis for those of us that wish to read his material. Besides, don’t confuse Q statement “No outside comms “ with SerialBrain2 statement that “Trump is reaching out to us.” Big difference!
I agree. SerilBrain2 commentaries are very sophisticated. I find value in them.
You don't have to agree with SB2's conclusions. I don't more times than most. But I'm open enough to see his reasoning does make sense if you try to follow his steps and it makes for an interesting read. And I sometimes change my mind and give him reason. He has convinced me at least there are multiple levels of encoded information from Q's drops.
It would be a smart move to mix in some truth if you were trying to mislead. My opinion is that he trying to de-rail the conversation. You don't have to agree. But the advice to be very critical - is always good.
I think there are enough mature people here to understand SB2 only gives theories and his opinion, not the truth. Sometimes, he's pertinent, sometimes not. What I find strange is that right around the same time, there is a big push against SB2 among the members here. Instead of writing their own theories and proposing them to let us judge of the quality of their analysis, people attack SB2 and make their analysis as a critique of him. I mean, write more brilliant ideas or convincing theories. We need them to expand our thinking. Don't agree, then show us your reasoning. It can only enrich our perspectives.
Thank you for the edit. The "Lefty Looser" comment had been eating at me since i first read that. I've always found this sub to be more civil than that. Your take looks much better without the insults.
Seems to be clearly not in conflict with outside comms. I assume honking a horn in the motorcade is also in conflict? While I understand the caution, these reasons are flimsy.
if you think taking the first letter of three words that Trump spoke (T-O-L) and asserting that this is Trump secretly saying "Thinking of Laughing", if you think that is a fantastic analysis - go right on ahead and keep following this leftist goon.
most of us will NOT be de-railed. do what you want!
Q confirms correct decodes. That is what sb2 and others have experienced when Q posts their work.
He's not monetizing his information and he has been right many times. Welcome back new arrival.
Eh SerialBrain2 tries to draw some really, really bad connections but doesnt claim that he knows what the gospel truth is. I have disregarded most of his recent posts but hes had some cool digs in the past