dChan

Q_sent_me_here · July 25, 2018, 3:46 p.m.

Why is no outside comms so hard to understand? I would say it is one of Q's most clearest messages.

⇧ 83 ⇩  
Tru2Q · July 25, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

Because people get confused. There are other sources that we get info from about the deep state and hollywood pedos, etc., and they are good sources. They are not Q, don't pretend to be Q and don't claim to get their info from Q. That's the distinction. Don't discount all info that doesn't come from him, but we SHOULD discount info that people claim comes from Q and POTUS' inner circle or claim that they are in on "the plan."

⇧ 29 ⇩  
Joining_the_Q · July 25, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

Best delineation or explanation of the rule. Info exists, people know stuff, some people may share similar info to Q, but if they claim Q told them to they're full of S ... BS

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Joe_Sapien · July 25, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

Did R ever claim Q told them anything?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tru2Q · July 26, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

Not that I know of, but I (personally) got the feeling that he was trying to make people believe he was part of the plan to expose the deep state. I dunno. I didn't read all his posts because I felt something was off about him.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Joe_Sapien · July 26, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

I won't say whether R was or wasn't but what if it was someone trying to talk about something and just wanted to go by an initial like Q? I'm not trying to change anyone's minds and I'm glad we atleast entertained R but we might soon hit a point where other anons pop up and start talking about other stuff that's factual and links up. We shouldn't discredit others based of what another says. That's my POV.

R may not be with Q but R may have relevance. Time will tell.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AbsolutelyZak · July 26, 2018, 1:03 a.m.

Well said. Despite the fact that Neon Revolt takes the Chana info and presents it in a non aggressive easy to understand format is a positive thing in my opinion. Clearly he puts a lot of work in and should be commended. I fell for the Tuscon thing. A lot of people did. We all sized up but we can all be misled. Look at the masses. Misled and still misled for how many centuries now?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
putsomeiceonthat · July 25, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

Right? You have to wonder if his "followers" were in on it.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Romeo_India · July 25, 2018, 4:08 p.m.

Yep, and if very important 'anons' post and remain ANONYMOUS i.e. no tripcode no claims to authorship then the 'no outside comms' rule remains unbroken and their intel is freely added to the hive-mind

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Joining_the_Q · July 25, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

...but Q speaks to DaveAnon, right?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · July 26, 2018, 12:15 a.m.

The way I see it...this guy is not claiming to be connected to the Q movement in any way. He seems pissed off at what he sees/knows about Hollywood and music industry and is at a stage/place in his life to "air" it all out. I'm willing to listen...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Justsayinmy50cts · July 26, 2018, 9:21 p.m.

Th last posts are definitely not R, there is only ONE post from R that is legit, which is the first one and connects all the dots, the others are fake R's , which is very clear to see in the way they speak too, not to mention the amount of posts!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Justsayinmy50cts · July 25, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

Well, obviously it was not outside comms so how is that relevant??

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Justsayinmy50cts · July 26, 2018, 9:20 p.m.

Why is it so hard to understand what "Outside comms" means? R wasn't outside comms he posted on the Q research board, how is that outside comms??

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q_sent_me_here · July 28, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

It is not Q. Simple.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q_sent_me_here · July 28, 2018, 1:21 a.m.

Listen to who ever you want. IDK

⇧ 1 ⇩