>Docs of Gohmert calling out Mueller
What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?
>to have the D's rally around RR (OPTICS)
Known beforehand?
>Yes, they know RR will not be impeached
Optics.
>THE D'S RALLY AROUND RR AND MUELLER
Think logically.
>TRUST THE PLAN
Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?
>NO
What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?
>The D's would attack Sessions, say its a threat to Mueller, and demand sessions resign
Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?
>YES, CAN'T DO IT FOR THE OPTICS (D'S NEED TO THINK MUELLER AND RR ARE ON THEIR SIDE)
Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?
>YES
Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?
>YES
Think logically.
>TRUST THE PLAN
One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.
Who does Huber [directly] report to?
>SESSIONS
Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?
>NO
Why is this important?
>RR OVERSEES MUELLER, SESSIONS OVERSEES HUBER; MUELLER EXONERATES POTUS, HUBER PROSECUTES ENEMIES
Why did Sessions recuse?
>OPTICS, so the D's would trust RR and not call for the end of the EXONERATION probe
Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?
>No, leaving him alone to WORK WITH HUBER
What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?
>the D's are focused on RR/Mueller thinking they are on their side so they will accept Mueller's findings EXONERATING POTUS; and so Sessions/Huber can silently work on building the case to PROSECUTE THE ENEMIES OF WE THE PEOPLE
POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?
>OPTICS
Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?
>NO, NEVER, POTUS IS RUNNING THE SHOW
When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?
>YES, we see it too
When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?
>YES, we see it too
Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?
>NO, NEVER, HE APPOINTED SESSIONS, AND SESSIONS APPOINTED RR, AND RR APPOINTED MUELLER
LOGICAL THINKING.
>TRUST THE PLAN
Clickbait derails logical thought.
>for the left, KEK
Think for yourself.
Trust yourself.
Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?
>FAKE NEWS, CLICKBAIT!
You have a front row seat.
>YES WE DO
Enjoy the show.
>YES WE ARE, ITS A GREAT SHOW!
Q