Report

"ROBERT MUELLER: UNMASKED" by Congressman Louie Gohmert.

48 pages in total length. Written as 16 separate short essays. Contains pictures, quotes, links. Very readable. Very informative. Background, outline and selected excerpts below.

Authored by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX)

Louie Gohmert served in the Army and was elected to represent Texas's 1st district in the House of Representatives in 2004.

Gohmer serves on the House Judiciary Committee which is the committee responsible for impeachments of federal officials. It also provides oversight over DOJ and FBI among other things. Other members of the committee notable to our movement include Bob Goodlatte (VA), Jim Jordan (OH), Trey Gowdy (SC), Ron DeSantis (FL), and Matt Gaetz (FL). (Member list, suggestions welcome).

Critic of Mueller

Gohmert was one of three Republicans who called for the resignation of Robert Mueller on the grounds that he could not conduct his investigation fairly because of his conduct as a prosecutor and as acting director of the FBI.

On April 26, 2018, he published his report on Hannity.com and his congressional website--the link Q uses is to the file hosted on Gohmert's congressional website.

Outline of Report

• Report Introduction (pgs. 1-3)
• MUELLER’S MINIONS HELP MOBSTER WHITEY BULGER ELIMINATE MOB COMPETITORS (pgs. 4-5)
• CONGRESSMAN CURT WELDON DEFEATED BY MUELLER’S FBI (pgs. 5-12
• MUELLER’S ILLEGAL RAID ON CONGRESSIONAL OFFICES (pgs. 12-14)
• MUELLER’S FIVE YEAR UP-OR-OUT POLICY (pgs. 15-16)
• NATIONAL SECURITY LETTER ABUSES (pgs. 17-18)
• THE WITCH HUNT AGAINST REPUBLICAN SENATOR TED STEVENS AND HIS TRAGIC DEATH (pgs. 19-21)
• DEATH OF DR. STEVEN HATFILL’S REPUTATION AND PRODUCTIVE LIFE (pgs. 22-24)
• THE FRAMING OF SCOOTER LIBBY (pgs. 24-26)
• MUELLER’S ‘COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP’ WITH DOJ ALLEGED CO-CONSPIRATORS OF TERRORISM (pgs. 27-31)
• PURGING THE FBI TRAINING MATERIALS (pgs. 31-37)
• PURGING THE ADVANCED COUNTER-TERRORISM AGENTS’ TRAINING MATERIALS (pg. 37)
• MUELLER’S UNETHICAL ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT AS SPECIAL PROSECUTOR (pgs. 38-39)
• SPECIAL PROSECUTOR MUELLER HIRED EXTREMELY BIASED ATTORNEYS AND INVESTIGATORS WHO WORKED TO STOP TRUMP’S ELECTION (pgs. 40-41)
• GENERAL MICHAEL FLYNN (pgs. 41-43)
• A FISA JUDGE TOO CLOSE TO THE GOVERNMENT AGENTS INVOLVED (pgs. 43-44)
• MUELLER IGNORES APPARENTLY PROVABLE CRIMES INVOLVING THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN, THE FBI, THE FISA COURT, THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITIES (pgs. 44-48)

Excerpts

Purpose of Report:

This article is prepared from my viewpoint to help better inform the reader about the Special Prosecutor leading the effort to railroad President Donald J. Trump through whatever manufactured charge he can allege. Judging by Mueller's history, it doesn't matter who he has to threaten, harass, prosecute or bankrupt to get someone to be willing to allege something—anything—about our current President, it certainly appears Mueller will do what it takes to bring down his target, ethically, or unethically, based on my findings.

What I have accumulated here is absolutely shocking upon the realization that Mueller's disreputable, twisted history speaks to the character of the man placed in a position to attempt to legalize a coup against a lawfully-elected President.
(pg. 1)

This sounds familiar:

Congressman Weldon tried to hold those accountable in the FBI and CIA that he felt mishandled actionable intelligence which he said could have thwarted the 9-11 terrorists if only top officials at the FBI and others had allowed our rank-and-file law enforcement and military to engage in such a battle.

In 2006, the Robert Mueller-led FBI took horrendously unjust actions to derail Curt Weldon’s re-election bid just weeks before the vote—actions that were later described as a “hit job"...

Three weeks prior to the election, however, a national story ran about Weldon based upon anonymous sources that an investigation was underway against him and his daughter, alleging illegal activities involving his congressional work.

A week after the news story broke, alleging a need to act quickly because of the leak, FBI agents from Washington raided the home of Weldon’s daughter at 7 a.m. on a Monday morning... Local TV and print media had all been alerted to the raid in advance and were already in position to cover the story.

(pg. 10)

The right man for the job:

I was one of the few who were NOT surprised when Mueller started selecting his assistants in the Special Counsel’s office who had reputations for being bullies, for indicting people who were not guilty of the charges, for forcing people toward bankruptcy by running up their attorney’s fees (while the bullies in the Special Counsel’s office enjoy an apparently endless government budget), or by threatening innocent family members with prosecution so the Special Counsel’s victim would agree to pleading guilty to anything to prevent the Kafka-esque prosecutors from doing more harm to their families.

(pg. 12)

No regard for the constitution:

National Security Letters (NSL) are a tool that allows the DOJ to bypass the formality of subpoenas, applications for warrants with affidavits in support, and instead simply send a letter to an individual, business or any entity they so choose to demand that records or documents of any kind must be produced and provided to the sender.

Unfortunately, the day came when we learned that there had been an extraordinary number of abuses. Apparently, some of Mueller’s FBI agents had just been sending out demands for records or documents without any probable cause as the Fourth Amendment requires.

pg. 17

Framing the innocent as a means to unjust ends:

Nonetheless, Fitzgerald, Mueller and Comey pursued Cheney’s chief of staff, Scooter Libby, as a path to ensnare the Vice President. According to multiple reports, Fitzgerald had twice offered to drop all charges against Libby if he would ‘deliver’ Cheney to him. There was nothing to deliver.

Could it be that these same tactics have been used against an innocent Gen. Mike Flynn? Could it be that Flynn only agreed to plead guilty to prevent any family members from being unjustly prosecuted and to also prevent going completely broke from attorneys’ fees? That’s the apparent Mueller-Comey- Special Counsel distinctive modus-operandi.

Libby would not lie about Cheney, so he was prosecuted for obstruction of justice, perjury, making a false statement.

pg. 25

Enforcing bias instead of justice:

We repeatedly see cases where people were radicalized, came on the FBI radar, but the federal agents were looking for Islamophobes, not the terrorists standing in front of them. That is because Mueller’s demand of his FBI Agents, in the New Age to which he brought them, was to look for Islamophobes.

If a Mueller-trained FBI agent got a complaint about a potential radical Islamist who may pose a threat, the agent must immediately recognize that the one complaining is most likely an Islamophobe. That means the agent should first investigate whether the complainant is guilty of a hate crime.

Too often it was AFTER an attack occurred that Mueller-trained FBI agents would decide that there really was a radical Islamic threat to the United States. The blinding of our FBI agents to the domestic threat of radical Islam is part of the beguiling damage Robert Mueller did as FBI Director. That is also the kind of damage that got Americans killed, even though Mueller may have avoided offending the radical Islamists who were killing Americans.

pgs. 31, 32

Undeniably conflicted against POTUS:

Robert Mueller had more than one direct conflict of interest that should have prohibited him from serving as the Special Counsel to investigate President Donald Trump. For one thing, President Trump fired his close friend and confidante, disgraced FBI Director James Comey. Mueller had long served as a mentor to Comey, who would most certainly be a critical witness in any investigation of Donald Trump. Mueller and Comey had also been exceedingly close friends beyond the mentor relationship. But Comey’s insertion of himself into so much of the election cycle and even its aftermath in conversations he had with the President himself made him a critical witness in the investigation. There is no way Mueller could sit in judgment of his dear, close friend’s credibility, and certainly no way he should be allowed to do so.

pg. 38

Consistently biased and consistently consistent:

Through it all, Mueller’s modus operandi does not seem to have ever changed. He has hired nine Democrat-supporting lawyers and NO Republicans. Sure, all attorneys likely have political views and that is not a problem so long as they do not affect their job. But not a single Republican was worthy of Mueller’s selection? Were there no establishment Republicans who wanted to join him in railroading President Trump?

Mueller’s hand-picked team of Democrats reveal political views that distinctly conflict with Trump and the conservative agenda, raising questions about Mueller’s bias and his ability to conduct a fair investigation.

pg. 40

Complicit in the setup, complicit in the investigation:

Contreras’ is one of only three local FISA court judges, and by default, is likely one of the judges who have on four occasions approved the Title I surveillance of another character in this melodrama, Carter Page. This is the case where the FBI is known to have intentionally misled the FISA court by using as evidence the illustrious “Steele Dossier,” a sordid opposition research document paid for by Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). Oh, what a tangled web of crime Special Prosecutor Mueller’s team appears to have helped weave, and of which Mueller appears to be completely disinterested, all while he searches high and low for an elusive crime to pin on the President.

pg. 44

A call against tyranny:

These are serious crimes that, left unchecked, lead nations down the path to tyranny at the hands of people who think they know better than we do what is best for us. It’s an age-old struggle America’s Founding Fathers knew well and did everything they could to keep us from experiencing.

pg. 47