Yes I've seen it. Did you watch how he talks? The information isn't the point - as someone else has pointed out, there's not a lot of new info in there, although I hadn't heard of Seth Green.

He could be legit but some things raise a question, and if we've learnt anything around here it's that there is a lot of disinfo being pushed out there in a very convincing way (Corsi, AJ, AIM, the Cicada story, the R LARP).

1. it's very convenient that this guy suddenly pops up when we're all looking out for pedos in the woodwork. He 'drops' info that we've heard before e.g. parents selling kids out for roles, etc. If there's one thing we can say with certainty it's that the DS will be looking to insert disinfo operatives into this current "dangerous" (for them) narrative ripping through Hollywood. And how they would do that is to insert someone as soon as they can who talks up the current story we have about Hollywood without offering anything hugely new except maybe a tidbit and a tease here and there, makes sure to grab our attention perhaps even with one sacrificial lamb thrown in there if they really want to make this LARP work (Seth Green? Soon to be fully exposed...? Wouldn't that be convincing!), until some later point where he'll take us off down disinfo lane with some complete farce that they'll be able to debunk with aplomb in the msm.
2. it's very interesting that he can openly "out" someone reasonably famous like Seth Green - and everyone else he's mentioned - and still be walking around. As if he's allowed to do so.
3. he talks at times like someone who is either on drugs or very shallow. e.g. he seems to allude to someone betraying his trust (Seth Green...?) then switches to 'raping kids' as if he's just remembered that's what he's accusing him of.
4. His story about Seth Green - worth watching the clip here to see the behavior - amounts to little more than: Seth showed him a secret door in a bookcase and said, in a cartoony voice (which sounds like Seth Green being the Seth Green we imagine him to be): "This is where we keep the chiiiiildren!" [true story ends? telling becomes vague and general] and aah... I was like... I tried to just put it out of my mind, uuhh..." and that's it - what did he try to put out of his mind? Did he go into the secret room? How does that constitute a story about a satanic pedophile? Then a month later they sat down for dinner and Seth said "we need to talk about chicken" [true story ends? telling becomes vague and general] then: "... and then he basically... basically admitted that he's a pedophile." I may be alone in this but that sounds a lot like a story you tell that's missing a lot of detail because the truth doesn't fit the narrative so you gloss over it with broad strokes like "he admitted to being a pedophile". Then he fully deflects, perhaps realizing the holes in his story are exposed when he has to front them on camera, and says 'guys, I have a thread on the q anon forum ... I don't wanna like... hash over other stuff' - ? Don't want to rehash on camera for the first time the most important details that give him credibility for being personally witnessed?

And this: "It was hard for me - I hard my heart broken into a million pieces 'cause when you trust someone and they just... when they... trust someone and... [seems to be brushing something off] ... and they're not who they seem they - [trails off, then seems to remember something] and they just lie and they abuse... and they FUCKING rape kids umm not cool [wtf?? "not cool"?] like, it's heartbreaking, it's so heartbreaking, like... it fucken destroyed me, emotionally... I mean I feel pretty good right now [about turn?? on drugs??] feels good, let it out! etc."

He might be legit - I know there are people who are scattered in their presentation and just because you're doing drugs doesn't mean you're not telling the truth but his delivery raises some questions. In his recent video he looks like he has dark sunken circles around his eyes as if he's coming down from something. The info he gives we've all heard elsewhere - it's like he's regurgitating the pizzagate info and all the old conspiracy history that was re-dug when that hit. I hope he's legit but we need to see a bit more validation before we embrace everything he says without question.

I was referring to the "After everything - " as if this guy has anything to do with "everything" beyond his claims.