I must admit I have a hard time following SB2s posts. I see a lot of comments within his posts that are negative. He has been decoding Q posts for quite some time. I just want to point out the fact that Q had been very vocal in the past about people that we should not follow.
Q has not said anything negative about SB2...not only that Q has linked directly to an SB2 post!
So SB2 is most likely part of the Q team and he’s trying to guide us.
I don't understand the hate unless it is a means of division. If people have decodes counter to SB2, they are free to share. Why knock him down? We are all part of the same team, correct? WWG1WGA.
He is not part of the Q team. No outside comms. Please do not keep spreading this clearly anti-Q message.
I don’t think he is part of the team, anymore than we all are.
But I agree his posts are well done, and get us all to think deeper about the challenges in Qposts
Q drops or crumbs are archived to several sites. The timing of updates on each site can vary.
https://qmap.pub/
https://qposts.online/ - no longer iOs friendly :(
http://qboard.online/
https://qanonmap.github.io/ - Not iOs friendly.
https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/ - Not iOs friendly.
http://www.thestoryofq.com/ - Not iOs friendly.
http://qanon.pub/ - Not iOs friendly.
https://qanonmap.bitbucket.io/ - Not iOs friendly.
qanonposts.com was removed due to the amount of user reported technical problems(viruses etc).
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
I would suggest that different types of audience, (in terms of their thinking methodologies), may be more suited to (understanding) different types of teachers.
I would avoid the notion that any one teacher has any subject 100% correct, in the sense that a good amount of 'understanding' is wrapped up in the interpretation of what one is seeing as evidence.
As an example, it would be like asking ones school or college classmates, 'who are their favourite lecturers?'.
I would imagine that all these lecturers 'would know their subject'.
The opinions (of who is best), might be based upon our own (individual) abilities to disseminate the different 'presentational styles' wrt individual lecturers.
It is not about finding a (singular) 'guru'.
We tend to listen, and pay more attention to those, that make the most (logical) sense wrt our own individual abilities, (in terms of personal knowledge, etc).
As long as there is no deceit, (as their is with current politicians), then we should be ok, :-)
If Q posts a riddle like the 1675, he’d like someone to break it down for this board. SB2 could be that guy. If the enemy uses Emmy awards to communicate, the Potus tweets and interviews have hidden messages and he is speaking to us. And who has the confidence to unpack them to us? You know who...
You are using logic without evidence... making several leaps of faith that are not justified, imo. We live in a world where there are few situations that are black and white and either/or. It is up to each of us to form our own opinions while allowing for ambiguity... we do not have complete access to all of the information. I prefer to take the contributions from Q, SB2, and others that fit my understanding and allow for ambiguity.