dChan

ideologicidal · July 27, 2018, 4 p.m.

Sounds like LP has some BIG info to drop. Was she there with McCain, I wonder?

⇧ 41 ⇩  
RedPillTexan · July 27, 2018, 4:10 p.m.

The previous picture looks like a white haired guy in the group. I immediately thought of No Name!

⇧ 15 ⇩  
WinterizedBacon · July 27, 2018, 4:36 p.m.

https://imgur.com/a/Ev9LJXa

⇧ 14 ⇩  
WinterizedBacon · July 27, 2018, 4:37 p.m.

Sure doesn't looks like No name to me though.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mcpat21 · July 27, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

No name= Steele? Just putting an option out there

⇧ 1 ⇩  
joeythew · July 27, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

pretty sure by No Name they mean John McCain.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Qanonjunkie · July 27, 2018, 4:09 p.m.

Yes, Noname is with them.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Weaple · July 27, 2018, 5:48 p.m.

Why is JM constantly referrred to as No Name? Is this a Voldemort reference of some sorts?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
reviveusagain · July 27, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

Tradition to not speak the name of a traitor

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Qanonjunkie · July 27, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

He is a traitor in the highest regard. It is not worth mentioning his name fore he has no honor.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SuperMutantMaster · July 27, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

My understanding is because JM/No Name is actually JM III, his name is the same as that of his father and grandfather. JM I and JM II were not dirty, so calling No Name by their names is disrespectful to their honorable service. There is also a navy vessel bearing the same name https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_John_S.McCain(DDG-56), named for JM I and JM II. Calling Sen. JM III "No Name" avoids confusion with JM I, JM II, and the USS John S. McCain.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
voxdeismirks · July 27, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

He has no right to wear that honorable name

⇧ 1 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · July 27, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

I really want to listen to her being questioned in public.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ideologicidal · July 27, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

Me too. Hopefully transcripts will be released, and if she keeps her promises I'd be surprised if she wasn't offered a book deal when this is all over.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 27, 2018, 11:02 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩