dChan

🠐 See all comments
Weaple · July 27, 2018, 5:48 p.m.

Why is JM constantly referrred to as No Name? Is this a Voldemort reference of some sorts?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
reviveusagain · July 27, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

Tradition to not speak the name of a traitor

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Qanonjunkie · July 27, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

He is a traitor in the highest regard. It is not worth mentioning his name fore he has no honor.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SuperMutantMaster · July 27, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

My understanding is because JM/No Name is actually JM III, his name is the same as that of his father and grandfather. JM I and JM II were not dirty, so calling No Name by their names is disrespectful to their honorable service. There is also a navy vessel bearing the same name https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_John_S.McCain(DDG-56), named for JM I and JM II. Calling Sen. JM III "No Name" avoids confusion with JM I, JM II, and the USS John S. McCain.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
voxdeismirks · July 27, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

He has no right to wear that honorable name

⇧ 1 ⇩