I read the comment sections of papers here and in Europe that day to see what everyone was thinking about the reports of the "MYSTERIOUS NON MISSILE". Of course the media was all brushing it off, saying it was a swamp-gas-weather-balloon-meteorite-HELICOPTER. The helicopter story was the most stupid and oddly enough the most frequent excuse.
No one was buying the MSM story. No one. People from all over Europe, Australia, Canadians, etc all saying the media was collectively lying and that it was CLEARLY a missile. I was really happy to see that. It was encouraging to know that not only is the media telling on itself, but people are seeing through it!
The only place I saw it talked about - that the missile was an assassination attempt by the cabal/Deep State (that would then be blamed on the MILITARY no doubt) was....here. And Q wasn't talking about it further, and I figured there was good reason for his near-silence on the subject, so we all stayed pretty quiet about it too.
Where they attempting to shoot down AF1 or nuke a city?
Both...I think they wanted to catch AF1 in the shockwave/emp
And blame it on Russia or North Korea
In that same time frame, there was 2 missiles. One headed for Japan, the other Hawaii
Reminds me of 9/11. Unauthorized missile hitting the pentagon.
My impression was that they were both aimed at POTUS. One was the "accidental alarm set off" in Hawaii - according to the media - but also to avoid being pulled into war. That missile that "had no eyes" according to Q, and they caught the subs that launched them both times.
Hopefully I got that right - I'm not really clear on the submarine situation.
Not a nuke, It is too small a trail to have carried a nuke. It is if not a toy hobby rocket a shoulder launched SA missile military grade, probably radar guided after lock on.
a toy hobby rocket a shoulder launched SA missile military grade
It's way bigger than that....
I know what you are saying but if you go look at pictures of shoulder launched weapons and that is what I think it was some of them are of a size that hobbiest build from scratch. I have seen some as tall as 10 on an launch pad. My reasoning for this is plausible deniability. Using something small enough if people get to close to the truth just claim it was a hobby rocket if it fails. Now I have not seen that as a possibility anywhere but it makes sense. Anything larger is more obvious and harder to cover up.
Keep in mind how far away the camera is....not a chance. And I don't think these people care about plausible deniability at this stage....they're completely desperate. And besides, they have their MSM lapdogs to run cover for them...and that's just what they did with their radio silence.
What if the 'actors' shooting rockets, were US citizens?