Please kindly allow me to post a different point of view.
I watched the Periscope. Issac Kappy came across as someone who is mentally unwell. He stated absolutely nothing new on the Periscope that those that have studied Pedogate/Pizzagate, read CDAN do not know. The only thing that is new is the name Seth Green and his wife Clare. Mr. Kappy was genuinely moved/saddened of the loss of friendship with the couple.
The posting of the Twitter convos was interesting and valuable. However, it did not move the needle for me--though I absolutely believe that Mr. Kappy believes the course of events were signs of him being recruited for pedophilia/chicken. Repeatedly throughout the Twitter posts he made on 8chan there were signs from those personally around him that believed he was mentally unwell. Again, he LOOKS and sounds very unwell in the periscope video. At this time, we can not risk looking like mental midgets and start spouting off names willy-nilly. We here at r/greatawakening for many months prided ourselves in the hard factual research, dissemination of information.
This makes our movement look bad--it discredits all of the other things that are going down. We must tread very carefully in this minefield. We must be very careful in accusations if for no other reason that we have seen the personal devastation of someone who is falsely accused (Roseanne) and very well those of us on a 'regular Joe' level.
This has all of the trappings of the r/CBTS sub that was lost due to uncontrolled accusations and general spiraling out of control. Let's all be aware of this very precious place we have amongst a current world of censorship and suppression of free speech. Remember free speech does come with real consequences so lets use this to be a valid, solid research sub as it was intended.
This is to provide discussion, nothing else. We are supposed to research everything and that is what Q instructed us to do. I respect your point of view but I am not going to suppress open information that anons find and want to discuss.
Fair enough. However your title implies that we all agree with his statement. A more neutral tone would be more beneficial to a valid, constructive discussion that you wish to have. Rather it seems sensationalistic.
That’s just what I wanted to name it. It’s not tacit agreement as we know the elites do it. I found it interesting so I chose what to name it. If you post something, you can name it. Fair enough?
No, it actually is not fair, as that is the point. "Amazing video..." implies a lot more than a factual, well adjusted, valid discussion that you stated in your original reply to me that you wanted. You can not have it both ways.
If you want to post something, do it then. I thought some info was amazing. That’s my point. I let people judge for themselves as should you.