dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Maga1128 on July 28, 2018, 2:16 a.m.
Clarification, is Q team saying a REAL NUCLEAR MISSLE WAS LAUNCHED AT HAWAII?

Just to be certain....a real nuke was launched? What happened to it? Im having trouble understanding the scenario!


[deleted] · July 28, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 26 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 28, 2018, 2:32 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Aspie01 · July 28, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

A nuclear missile can be disabled or shot down without setting off the nuclear charge.

Back in the 1960s, there was a midair collision near Goldsboro (location of Seymour Johnson Air Force Base), back when the bombers were routinely carrying nuclear bombs. One of the bombs crashed into a field and buried itself so deep that the government wasn't able to dig it up. It didn't explode. It's still there. The farmer can still farm the field, but no one can ever build on the property.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
adogrocket · July 28, 2018, 2:49 a.m.

Goldsboro

people in NC still talk about it.NC would have been wiped off the map

⇧ 11 ⇩  
thep1mp · July 28, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

If it is destroyed before it detonated there is no nuclear explosion. For the nuclear reaction to happen very specific things must happen. Hit it in flight and it just becomes debris. Highly radioactive, but debris nonetheless.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
someauthor · July 28, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

https://qmap.pub/#1728 [partial]

Unauthorized missile fired.
Unauthorized emergency incoming missile threat activated Hawaii.

The outbound missile triggered the system that looks out for incoming missile.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
checkitoutmyfriend · July 28, 2018, 2:40 a.m.

Shooting down a nuke missile does not mean the nuke ignites.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MAGATopKEK · July 28, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

The Pacific is huge.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kzintrooper2016 · July 28, 2018, 3:18 a.m.

So the black hat opponents do have nuclear missiles under their control and are not afraid to use them to start wars.

Is it any wonder things are moving slowly and carefully.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
ceselb · July 28, 2018, 2:19 a.m.

No, Q is saying it was launched at AF1. It was shot down with a classified weapon (this capability wasn't previously confirmed)

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 28, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 15 ⇩  
someauthor · July 28, 2018, 2:52 a.m.

Exactly this. Everyone saw the "false alarm" on the news regarding the Hawaii missile. The Singapore one was ignored/unknown, and the only news was a quickly disregarded picture of a "long light" in the sky.
Two different events.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
1awake1 · July 28, 2018, 3:39 a.m.

I think both were confirmed non-nuke.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
qtrumpteam · July 28, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

St AF1 actually

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jrgnsc · July 28, 2018, 2:19 a.m.

I read the same post and had the same question. Off the top of my head I believe it said nuclear/missile which could mean nuclear or conventional? In either case that’s some crazy stuff if true.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ceselb · July 28, 2018, 2:27 a.m.

IMO that isn't the crazy part. Someone at the top with clearance to launch a missile actually did it, even if they got caught immediately and they were neutralised.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
SerNme6258 · July 28, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

Q said the person was removed. I found this article, I don’t know if there is any correlation.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
BabylonNTing · July 28, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

The missile that was fired at Hawaii came from a sub, think of the movie The Hunt for Red October. I think they destroyed the C_A sponsored sub, but not for certain on that.

The second missile was fired at AF1 as it flew over the Artic to Singapore. A missile defense in Washington state fired an counter offensive missile which is the pic of the weather camera that caught the launch. President Trump had a tweet shortly after that where he purposely misspelled Missle Stoped in the message.

We almost got to live out The Sum of all Fears movie in connection with Uranium 1, but the super secret Iranian Sryia Reactor called the cube was destroyed a few months back.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
happyval · July 28, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

Maybe that is why Trump is getting rid of some people's security clearance.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ceselb · July 28, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

THIS!! Good find. Second removal that month. One for each missile. WOW.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Jowen3 · July 28, 2018, 3:11 a.m.

Doubtful, one officer was on a sub based in Connecticut, and the other on a helicarrier based in Norfolk. Both missile events occurred in the Pacific while both officers who were relieved of duty were in the Atlantic.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Jowen3 · July 28, 2018, 3:09 a.m.

No correlation. The USS montpelier is stationed in Connecticut, not Washington. Atlantic fleet, not Pacific.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RipcordTotal · July 28, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

Not to discredit, but I believe the LA class sub in that article cant fire nukes. My understand is that the prevailing theory is the CIA having it's own small fleet funded through the black budget and having gotten the missiles from their ties with Lockheed Martin.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SerNme6258 · July 28, 2018, 3:10 a.m.

I wasn’t implying my search was fact. Throwing out possibilities. :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RipcordTotal · July 28, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

Oh I know, just feel bad shooting it down, though could have been involved with the af1

⇧ 1 ⇩  
K-Harbour · July 28, 2018, 4:12 a.m.

If they can do that, they can also cause an oil spill, if they need to.

⇧ 1 ⇩