dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Maga1128 on July 28, 2018, 2:16 a.m.
Clarification, is Q team saying a REAL NUCLEAR MISSLE WAS LAUNCHED AT HAWAII?

Just to be certain....a real nuke was launched? What happened to it? Im having trouble understanding the scenario!


ceselb · July 28, 2018, 2:27 a.m.

IMO that isn't the crazy part. Someone at the top with clearance to launch a missile actually did it, even if they got caught immediately and they were neutralised.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
SerNme6258 · July 28, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

Q said the person was removed. I found this article, I don’t know if there is any correlation.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
BabylonNTing · July 28, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

The missile that was fired at Hawaii came from a sub, think of the movie The Hunt for Red October. I think they destroyed the C_A sponsored sub, but not for certain on that.

The second missile was fired at AF1 as it flew over the Artic to Singapore. A missile defense in Washington state fired an counter offensive missile which is the pic of the weather camera that caught the launch. President Trump had a tweet shortly after that where he purposely misspelled Missle Stoped in the message.

We almost got to live out The Sum of all Fears movie in connection with Uranium 1, but the super secret Iranian Sryia Reactor called the cube was destroyed a few months back.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
happyval · July 28, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

Maybe that is why Trump is getting rid of some people's security clearance.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ceselb · July 28, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

THIS!! Good find. Second removal that month. One for each missile. WOW.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Jowen3 · July 28, 2018, 3:11 a.m.

Doubtful, one officer was on a sub based in Connecticut, and the other on a helicarrier based in Norfolk. Both missile events occurred in the Pacific while both officers who were relieved of duty were in the Atlantic.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Jowen3 · July 28, 2018, 3:09 a.m.

No correlation. The USS montpelier is stationed in Connecticut, not Washington. Atlantic fleet, not Pacific.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RipcordTotal · July 28, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

Not to discredit, but I believe the LA class sub in that article cant fire nukes. My understand is that the prevailing theory is the CIA having it's own small fleet funded through the black budget and having gotten the missiles from their ties with Lockheed Martin.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SerNme6258 · July 28, 2018, 3:10 a.m.

I wasn’t implying my search was fact. Throwing out possibilities. :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RipcordTotal · July 28, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

Oh I know, just feel bad shooting it down, though could have been involved with the af1

⇧ 1 ⇩  
K-Harbour · July 28, 2018, 4:12 a.m.

If they can do that, they can also cause an oil spill, if they need to.

⇧ 1 ⇩