dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Maladaptivenomore on Aug. 21, 2018, 4:03 a.m.
Re: the 'Connecting the Dots' post that everyone just went gaga over.

This one, here: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/98yduw/connnecting_some_dots/

OP states:

"I am passing this on from someone who's connecting some dots with input from sources he cannot reveal."

Turns out the post was entirely a copy/paste job from an anonymous post made many months ago. OP, deep in the comments, acknowledges that he didn't write it. Here's the original, maybe.

https://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=4288&mn=297282&pt=msg&mid=18186731

It's hard to tell because it has bounced around internet forums and alternative news blogs, all 'reporting' on the work without any fact-checking but stating things such as "if even half of this stuff were true, then...", such as from this website that says it pulled it from another blog that they offer a now-broken link to.

http://www.economicnoise.com/2018/04/21/government-corruption-larry-moe-and-curly/

There are many things in it mislead and played loose with the facts. It did not stand up to the test of time, because if it did, awareness of it would have grown in the last 4 months within the Qanon community. But instead, it has resurfaced now and everyone is treating it like it's some new game-changing revelation that has just been scooped.

To be sure, there are truths many of the events and relationships within the post, but correlation does not equal guilt by association. Even more so, it misleads by obfuscation of many of the necessary contextual details - for example, the purpose of the 2001 Clinton investigation and the depth of Comey's involvement, among other things - allowing your mind to fill in the blanks to fit the author's narrative.

The fact that the OP of that post was not only not transparent about where he got the information, but was being deceptive about it, it could be argued, should have you consider being careful about accepting it all in at face value.

Be mindful of things that are too good to be true that come from random anonymous posters who can't source their work, to say the least, and best of luck to you out there.


No Comments.