Attention all free Anons

Im asking for brainstorming ideas re Q's crumbs on AUS connections/donations.

Q' Said >>8039

>What phone call between POTUS and X/AUS leaked?

Well im sure we know about the Trump Turnbull phonecall leak.

<theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/04/full-transcript-of-trumps-phone-call-with-australian-prime-minister-malcolm-turnbull

But i cant see what the implications of this leak are in context to the crumb.

Another thing that gets me is the X/ in front of AUS.

Does this mean ex/Australian PM?

Was there any comms b/w Trump and a PM prior to Turnbull?

Any help welcomed.

>>10351

looking at it now, thanks

>>10351

ok its not different from what i initially thought. Though if we cant find anything else, it would look to be the Turnbull call.

Any help on understanding the importance of the question in the context of the crumbs would be appreciated, already figured out that AUS donated almost 100x more money to CF than SA did.

Just cooking up a graphic about this particular Q post and its stumping me.

>>10354

i have an infographic in the oven, AUS paid almost 100x more to CF than SA.

Need to figure out the reason behind Q telling us to look at the phonecall. or any other phonecall we might be missing.

>>10395

looking at it now, though i dont see any 'leaked' phonecalls. Still digging at the norman thread though.

>>10447

possibility. Its seeming that the only 'leaked' phone call would be the Trump Turnbull refugee call…

not finding much else outside that call

>>10466

getting paywall'd, dont have an extension for it.

>>10514

i have a graphic in the oven but stumped on the importance of the phone call part of the crumbs.

I think we can conclude that its referencing the Trump Turnball phone call re refugees. But i dont understand the importance of the call. Look up at the top of the thread and see my first post for a transcript and see if you get any ideas.

>>10544

whats this in reference to?

>>10566

im more interested specifically on the importance of the specific line of Qs post.

Why would Q mention the Leak or the contents of the leak in reference to the rest of that post?

>>10591

Ok thanks for the info re X placeholders.

Already checked the donations of AUS vs SA. (AUS donated nearly 100x more than SA!)

Already Done the PMs since BHO and posted in previous breads.

Australia votes based on Members of parliament who make up Parties. The people vote the representatives in based on their electorates. These electorates' members form parties based on their affiliations to try and form a majority government. I understand how it works.

>>10634

possible, takes a bit but still possible.

>>10654

well you gotta understand multiplication right, if SA puts $45m max, then its not too hard for AUS to put out ~$360USD (460AUD) over 10 years (since 06 Rudd>Gillard>Abbott) its entirely possible.

I mean there was a $880m AUD one off payment to Rupert Murdoch after Tony Abbott got in, so im ENTIRELY certain $460AUD is NOTHING.

smh.com.au/business/tax-office-forced-to-pay-rupert-murdoch-880m-20140217-32weo.html

>>10748

they are coming from both labor and liberal since 06-13, likelihood that it has anything to do with beef exports etc is unlikely to have spanned this timeframe.

>>10817

working on it as we speak.

Need to know the significance of Trump Turnbull phonecall leak in context to rest of that Q post.

>>10851

it disturbs me a lot more

>>10865

Hmm i wouldnt think the infrastructure in place could be suitable for large scale shilling ops.

>>10901

Dot Connected.