>>10376

> Meme makers can post memes in general thread if they wish feedback, in fact I think it's a good idea. THEN when you are satisfied with the meme, PLEASE take it over to the Memes thread and post it there. I'm trying to sweep up after anybody who forgets, but 100% harvesting is not a realistic goal.

This is very helpful, thank you. Good to know and remember!

>>10378

That was me. I feel really strongly about this and I'm not a "feels" type of guy. It's the same as the kid who wanted to create a cbts twitter and faceberg page. NO NO AND A 1000 TIMES NO. Terrible idea.

pic related for those who need to SEE it

No one sees the factory workers, the engineers at their desks, the back office folks. That's us. That's how it should be. When it starts becoming about individuals, the magic is lost. Personalities get involved. Personalities clash. Interest converge and diverge.

< ALL THAT MATTERS IS THE OUTPUT

Are we fulfilling the task POTUS set for us via Q?

Are we?!?!?

Is part of that task interviews and book deals?

NO

Our task is very, very simple (easier said than done)

>answer the question

>build the bigger picture

<"find the spiders build the web (map)"

DIRECT QUOTE - the MAP is the connections we find between the spiders

a la LOOP CAPITAL MARKETS, McKinsey & Co. &c.

>break it back down into manageable chunks

>make graphics to educate and calm the public

FOCUS ON HE OUTPUT NOT THE PERSONS.

I really hope this board's BO will pay attention and heed this. It's NOT about individuals, anons work in a team. It's about the output ONLY

>>10383

>So should we be archiving /cbts/?

Maybe the dedicated topic threads, but Q's not going to post in the general thread there anymore so I don't see any reason to do so. Master Archivist might do it, you'll have to ask him directly, but I'm not lurking or archiving those (general) threads anymore. I don't see the point in it.

Sidley Austin

The Asia Foundation

Follow the Wives

That's all I can think of right now, there might be other worthwhile threads to archive, so we don't lose all the good research.

>no reason to re-invent the wheel

>>10348

I'm the spreadsheet guy. Were you the one I was talking to in the last thread? If so, I could create a thread to work on a different solution to the smartsheet spreadsheet…

>>10444

> then retard spreadsheet anon closed his spreadsheet.

Did you even read the IMPORTANT SPREADSHEET UPDATE in the OP to find out why? If not, please do.

>>10565

Oh, it's you.

>You expect everyone to not miss the shit you have posted

It's in the OP as an announcement. I have no control of what people read or don't . But it's there as an announcement to reduce having to repeat the message and annoy other anons constantly explaining it. Seems logical to me.

>If you were not so bossy, arrogant and dumb, you would not be having people threaten to erase anything dipshit.

Threatening to erase all the good info that anons' have spent hours upon hours gathering because you don't like one personality is the height of pettiness and is destructive. I'm not here to be your friend. I'm here to complete a task, offering what I can, how I can.

This and the threats to delete answers/news are the reason the spreadsheet is no longer able to accommodate public-participation.

ANONS TAKE NOTE

It didn't have to be this way.

It wasn't this way before.

> Any you use those spreadsheets and do not pay for the service, then expect to be bossy and tell everyone what to do and not to do.

Paid vs free = Strawman of the silliest sort.

>>10595

If you look in the OP, there is a new spreadsheet. The old one expired. New link is in the OP. Anyone can read and download the spreadsheet, as it clearly says in the announcement, for the reasons in the announcement and above.

>>10510

Link to new thread. Look forward to seeing you there

>>>/thestorm/10637

>>10697

I am SpreadsheetAnon. I changed the settings to psychos would not delete all anons' hard work. That spreadsheet is no longer valid. The link to the new spreadsheet, now read-only and download-only is in the OP top posts.

This was done to honor all the many, many hours anons have put into this project. To PROTECT their work from psychos who threaten to delete it.

>>10714

Same strawman argument is still silly. That comparison is totally irrelevant. Threats to delete anons' hard work taken seriously and therefore the work is now protected.

Anons who have participated for a while can clearly see what is occurring. One anon respects and protects them and their work, others threaten to delete, use spurious arguments and threaten to destroy that hard work.

I'm on the side of anons here. Everyone has worked their fingers to the bone, Patriots all, and even around the world. ALL that matters is the output.

Work together to create, or destroy?

(you) will get no more responses. The issue is closed at this time until a satisfactory solution is found.

>>10885

I try to be responsive when I'm here. If you were the one who suggested to make a new smartsheet before the old one expired, I did reply to that and that was accomplished. It was good advice :)

Link to new spreadsheet is in the OP top posts.

There is a an obsessive anon samefagging over this issue.