>>14556

Who controls the Queen of England?

>>14572

>>14570

>>14571

I was going for the Roths.

>>14585

Of course, there's a lot more to it. But the royals lost their power when they lost the Bank of England. They had no choice but to bow down to the new King.

Australia is heavily influenced by the UN. They are beholden to the US for the sake of protection, as well as to keep their trade routes clear and safe. They are also at the mercy, in many ways, of China, as their biggest customer of resources.

We might as well ask who's in control of all that, and we'll have our answer.

>>14738

Who would you be warring with? ME? Civil?

What did AUS/UK obtain in exchange for all that money?

Did anyone come up with anything for this, yet? All I'm coming up with is protection. As in racquet.

>>14809

Hmm. I'm scratching my head and biting my nails, here.

Thanks. I'll move away from the carbon crap that I was looking at. Talk about going around in circles. Dizzy.

>>14816

I love the word 'Glorious', and a good morning to you. too. :)

>>14843

>>14836

Why, thank you. I'll go back to building models out of match sticks and glue now. I toyed with the education position, but let it go.

Much appreciated.

>>14899

She won't need to be. Aussies will hang her. She gave the impression of being one of them. Going as far as still staying in her little 3 bedroom house in the shitville suburbs when in Melbourne.

>>14925

Thanks. I was just reading about GetUp. I was actually wondering if he had anything to do with the APEX gangs, as well. They're disorganized, but people say that about MS-13. So, who knows?

>>14942

Sorry, when I said still, I meant when she was PM.

Yes, yes, the EO. I didn't think of that. I wonder how long its going to take for word to get to her that her dirty dealings have been 'revealed'. Another one that's shitting themselves, no doubt.