Anonymous ID: d5bde3 Jan. 7, 2018, 6:28 a.m. No.15181   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5188 >>5189 >>5820

How to hold a country hostage?

By controlling its energy?

Why subsidies useless solar and wind while pushing laws to shut down nukes which are only real viable low carbon source?

Who funds anti nuclear groups?

Is their intent to destroy base load power capability and replace with useless renewables?

Are they trying to guaranteed oil dependence?

Anonymous ID: d5bde3 Jan. 7, 2018, 7:04 a.m. No.15359   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5369 >>5835

Solar and wind may be viable for residential use but thats not what I said. Baseload power. Look it up. Its what creates and stabilizes the grid. Disparate and highly variable solar and wind sources CANNOT provide baseload power. Yet they shut down nuke plants that provide this with no plans to replace the power. Why?

 

As an example, Vermont shut down a 650 MW nuke plant that was contracted to sell 200MW to directly an IBM chip fab facility in Burlington. Where does that power come from now? Certainly not the broken windmills or solar panels covered in snow. They have 119MW if installed wind 'capacity'. Nobody will publicly admit what actual generation is but based on data from Germany and Spain who are farther down the road with wind… its a fuck load less than 119MW.