Tasty bread, thanks baker.

Witnessing the normie world reacting to the current chain of events really makes me think that we have not been up to the task of spreading the word and prepare normies to absorb the shock.

The white hats' biggest problem right now is not how to drain the swamp, it is how to drain the swamp without having the public going completely crazy and their enemies capitalize on mass hysteria as their last resort option.

Q is confirming everything we always suspected about the swamp and its atrocities. For them to be able to drain it, they need people to help waking up the brainwashed population and ensure that it can absorb the shock.

Basically the quality of our work is measured by how hard the news about the swamp can afford to be without the herd going crazy.

Or if I am wrong on this, kindly explain it to me.

We need to up our game. As Q said we don't have much time. Events are in motion. The less we prepare the field, the harder the political cost will be for the good guys to end the chain of criminal activities. I would really like to see other anons share my opinion.

>>15177

Seems simple and efficient. I like it. Where do we set the limit between allegations and evidence is the difficulty.

And it also doesn't address the worst stuff like Planned Parenthood, since it's hard to tie what's going on there to public figures.

Anyone has other thoughts on this?

>>15178

They certainly are testing the waters, but we are no normies and the doses of hard truth we can absorb are much higher, so it gives little actual indication of the public's potential reaction. It gives some, though. For instance it is probably very useful for Q to see us jumping around and losing our minds a little bit over the DEATH comment.

But I keep thinking that the primary reason for Q's presence is as simple as what he stated himself: we are here to help them spreading through social media and memetic warfare. And I think we can be much better at that than we've been.

CD session over. DJT back to DC

>>15209

you mean we should meme and spread it?

>>15234

It didn't seem very cryptic in the context. Q is as angry as we are, some of the stuff we now know is literally treason material, and especially examples must be made, I do not believe we can have a paradigm shift without a few mindblowing events for the awe of the masses. It may not necessarily have to go to public executions, but we are in Nuremberg territory here.

>>15239

ok point taken

this is what I was sort of pointing out in >>15200

We can't smear freely

>>15258

yeah I concur this is not a good approach

I am really of the opinion that Q posts should not be relayed at all outside as they are, but then again some anons think differently

What I think should be relayed however is conclusions drawn from the crumbs in normie-digestible format. THIS is what we need to use Twitter (and other media) for.

>>15298

fuck I have my head up my ass

could it be confirmation that the airport we have to look into re Awan's drop is Ronald Reagan?

>>15285

Any other anons share that view that we should AVOID sharing Q's posts on Twitter like they were POTUS' tweets?

>>15310

yes I know I was very much up for the whole thing

what I wonder is whether GEOTUS' tweet should be read as a form of confirmation, as another airport (Dulles) was in scope. Seems far-fetched, but we have seen stranger things.

>>15321

the Crystal City pics were taken by a random anon on Twitter and not confirmed as being ones of Awan

the guy looked more like MS-13

up to now I am not sold on this arrestation being Awan, as it didn't look like him

>>15331

That's my view. Twitter and other platforms should be used to share the connections we are able to do, NOT Q posts that are literally cryptic-conspiracy-tier.

>>15343

It was definitely a high-tier target. But that could be a lot of people. Awan not confirmed, AND that very same day his range of autonomy was extended iirc.

>>15350

We are at least 3-4 sharing that view on this thread already.

Could other anons give their view on sharing Q posts on Twitter? So far the consensus is that we should not. This is not Dallas. If normies are interested in Q posts they know where to find it. Twitter is for elaborate red pills.

I would be glad to hear other perspectives.

jfc can we please give a break to PA re YT appearances

As long as you don't make it a cringy broadcast of Q's drops as they are we need to try some stuff for our conclusions to reach normies

>>15382

Indeed. As well as this:

https: //t witter.com/DaveNYviii/status/949501891108593664

this is literally batter material, I suggest we make an exception

>>15401

Not bad at all

Maybe you should add what she earns as a Senator to put things in perspective

>>15394

>>15398

>>15409

Thanks anon. Still waiting for pro- arguments about sharing raw Q drops on Twitter.

If nobody jumps in, I suggest we add a recommendation to the batter to specifically avoid doing so. Don't relay Q drops on Twitter as they are, don't make #qanon or related hashtags trend. We need to tone it down on the cloak and dagger shit out of here, and tone it up on the workable connections that we are able to establish. Think >>15401 instead of a screenshot of Q drops.

Once again I don't want to impose anything on anybody, do challenge me here. All I am after is efficiency in spreading the message and preparing the normies for the Storm.

>>15433

HOLY SHIT

that fucking guy :')

Side note: clearly BO is in the crosshairs

>>15463

Ahah I missed that

Miller is a fucking juggernaut, I knew it would be fun

Can't wait for a link

>>15465

>>15469

fuck, I was sold already

this was definitely in Trump's territory

>>15505

Comments section are definitely the place to be. I agree with everything you say. Actually I don't know how many of us use Twitter but it might be useful to have a Twitter thread moving forward.

Before we get there, as we are halfway through the thread, appreciate if the next baker can signal he is aware of all that discussion

>>15515

Excellent post, anon. Thank you.

I concur and my hope is that these sealed indictments are exactly what you just described: the preparation of a full drain.

>speaking of which, we have no news of the sealed indictments for quite some time, are the indictments autists around?

Trump's EO seems like a step into the direction of drying the enemy's resources. What I am more concerned with is your point 2. While everybody has their skeletons it is hard to imagine that a good swamp draining will round up every single last university communist teacher in the country.

Trump is doing a stellar job at destroying mainstream media, but I have yet to see signs of massive action that would involve breaking the other pillar of the brainwashing system, the education system and its spearheads, the universities. IOW how do we dry the well once the refineries are out of order?

>>15584

kek

the only certainty with him is that it didn't happen according to the official version

Gotta go for now, anons.

Baker can we please add the recommendation to not share Q's posts on Twitter to the batter? Seems like a consensus here and it will help us.