Anonymous ID: f6e877 Jan. 7, 2018, 1:51 p.m. No.17814   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7833

Here we go again. Same rubbish, different thread. Thousands of useless comments burying anything useful.

 

I thought Q wanted a READ-ONLY thread.

 

Is there no baker that can achieve this?

Anonymous ID: f6e877 Jan. 7, 2018, 1:58 p.m. No.17865   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7902

>>17833

Sorry, just me being letting off steam….

 

I'm sure I'm not the only one who finds this process confusing and difficult to follow. All I want to see is GENUINE Q posts and REALISTIC answers to his questions.

 

If I knew how to work properly within this environment I would do exactly as you suggested.

 

I agree with the baker's notion right at the top of this thread that suggested Q create his own thread and manage it……