Anonymous ID: 0b764a Jan. 7, 2018, 3:38 p.m. No.18701   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8708 >>8726

>>18676

>>18668

Yeah, sorry I'm not even sure what markers are, much less what they are exactly. If that makes sense. I think they may be confirmations, eg pic related, POTUS tweets, etc.

 

And it would make sense that Q would want us to compile a graphic or map, in the way of his posts, of the confirmations of his posts. This would help redpill the normies greatly. I'm kinda surprised this doesn't exist yet come to think of it.

Anonymous ID: 0b764a Jan. 7, 2018, 3:40 p.m. No.18718   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8803

>>18689

Share your markers please. That's first step. Seems some of us are rather uninformed, myself included. I have to review your materials to analyze the rest of the contents of your post.

Anonymous ID: 0b764a Jan. 7, 2018, 3:44 p.m. No.18740   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8761

>>18726

Second time hearing this, still haven't seen (nor looked for, in fairness) proof. Anyway, the point still stands in that there's numerous POTUS tweets predicated by Q posts, or sharing keywords, or both. This is why timestamps are important.

Anonymous ID: 0b764a Jan. 7, 2018, 3:48 p.m. No.18770   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18697

Worth a try, if you feel yourself pulled in one direction towards some idea - explore. That's what digging is not that I think you need to be lectured by me, just saying.

Anonymous ID: 0b764a Jan. 7, 2018, 3:52 p.m. No.18789   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8842

>>18761

There's no list of synchronistic posts/tweets. That's the problem. I don't have the time to sift through hundreds of Q's posts and Trump's tweets personally identifying them, and probably missing several. It will require a group effort. Hence my posts!