>>19055

Thank you based Bread Baker for Baking the direction and post we need to focus on into the bread.

>>19143

i think there was meant to be a resource for that in the works but nothing has come of it yet.

we have qcodefag. github. io as a Q resource.

>>19167

So it looks like there is meant to be 5 total markers?

Q/Potus-# would mean Q posts that Potus posts have a specific correlation too.

So if we know [10] and [5], and possibly [15] (see Nov 4 Q Drop re: "Q= Alice") in what order is 5,10, and 15 in terms of Potus Marker number.

>>19232

see

>>19167

Potential for 5 total markers? If we have [15][10][5], then we have 2 more?

I swear Q was telling us RR was a marker, >>7930, sayign we missed something and then put RR inside [Square brackets]. Whats the chance that the RR tweet+Qcrumb difference is another marker.

>>19363

fairly certain (one of) the marker we are missing is a Jan 6 tweet combo.

>>19563

Ive had another thought, gather the markers (3 or 5 of them?) and add all the timestamps together/subtract them?

Could that be what he means by wind? Wind something UP, you build up tension in the clock.