>Loop capital
>Loop
>Pool
>Christopher Poole
MOOT, YOU BASTARD
Aye
To recap mine and a few other anons thoughts from last thread: it may be the case that markers are - among other things, possibly - synchronistic Trump tweets/Q posts, both in terms of timestamps or keywords, and one of the things Q has asked us to do is compile all of these markers and align them on a timeline (time ring) in some manner, eg according to a clock cipher perhaps.
Therefore any confirmations that picture both Trump's tweet and Q's post with timestamps accurately, are of import. Please share em if you got em.
Thank you anon. As far as I can tell, the top half of that image is very, very good; the bottom half is less important… insofar as the point, at this stage, is merely to document "coincidences." This shows 3, clearly, with timestamps, side by side, and is well written.
Q has said everything has meaning, nothing is coincidence. Even tweets/posts that are out of sync timewise, that share the same terms - and particularly, if capitalized, in one or both mediums tweet or post - may be relevant here. I can't promise I'll get to it tonight myself, but I'm curious to search Q's text for capitalized words from Trump's tweets, or vice versa.
Look stupid faggots, your rabid hatred for Hitler, however founded given Q's revelations, is only divisive at this point and in this location of the internet. Deal with it for now, this is not helping. The point of the image was merely to thank the anon, keep the sand out of your vaginas.
Bitch, you're clearly arguing from an emotionally and excessively upset mindset. You have a personal dislike for Hitler, obviously. And you're using Q's less than clear finger-point at him to justify your actions. Which are, forcing your view on everyone else. Which is childish. You are too invested in what other people think and do. Ignore posts you don't like. Your disruptions are unhelpful and more detrimental than the posts you complain about, at this point in time. Which are, any post that in any way mentions Hitler in anything less than a completely negative light. In short, fuck off.
>We also had the recent meeting at Camp David. Red line.
???
Also, there was some speculation last night that "red-line" may relate to ThinThread, NSA's superior program that was improperly shelved in favor of - what was it? Trailblazer, a huge time waste and money sink. Imo an unlikely connection but I thought I'd mention it.
>Trumps recent tweet
Post pic plox.
>allowing the cause to be aligned with something that is in fact what we are fighting against is counterproductive.
Is it? What, because some posters in some of the threads still show signs of reverence for Hitler? (a) That means nothing; (b) you gotta understand, some of the posters here came from /pol/ and they have been believing for years, possibly, that Hitler is /theirguy/, yet they mean well and it is neither fair nor reasonable for newfags or anyone, for that matter, to expect them to reconstruct their worldview so quickly, just be patient and let them come around as they surely will when they feel there is sufficient evidence, which is why they became convinced in their own minds that Hitler was good in the first place, and which there surely will be if Q is in fact legit (which I believe he is). When Nazi posts become even one tenth as detrimental as they were at the end of 4/cbts/, feel free to sound the alarm. But no sooner, please.
>The storm: Your equal opportunity justice bringers.
By your logic nothing we hope to disclose to them ought to be because they'll think we're all crazy. You don't think mass child-eating is permabluepill material? Go ahead and filter me bitch, you only just cost yourself useful information. Just what I'd expect from a childish faggot, triggered about Nazis, losing an argument. Announcing filtration is a violation on halfchan; maybe it should be here, too. We used to do that 20 years ago when we were literal children on IRC. Grow the fuck up faggot.