Anonymous ID: 204161 Jan. 7, 2018, 6:23 p.m. No.20117   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20071

>I didn't get any (you)'s :(

>YOU ALL SUCK

Friendly advice for future reference: kindly remind anons if you feel it's so important, or develop the idea a little more and try again.

Anonymous ID: 204161 Jan. 7, 2018, 6:39 p.m. No.20273   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20209

It's a good start, and thank you, but I find it too illegible personally. Also, I'd point out in case it isn't already widely observed: POTUS's use of the word 'puppets' seems like a confirmation in itself, given the frequency with which Q used the word puppets in his early postings in particular. I hope you continue your efforts!

Anonymous ID: 204161 Jan. 7, 2018, 6:54 p.m. No.20431   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0572

So Trump's tweet was missing a T in 'consequential.'

 

Q's post said 'win' when he meant 'when' based on context.

 

Letters in question are T, H, E.

Anonymous ID: 204161 Jan. 7, 2018, 7:06 p.m. No.20572   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20496

I like.

 

>>20477

Excellent!!! Keep going.

 

I'd offer >>20431 may be an indication we're at the beginning of an incoming encoded message via the same format as outlined in that post. This may lead to be a confirm eventually, but it's too early to tell either way for now.