Anonymous ID: 83f18d Jan. 7, 2018, 8:52 p.m. No.22269   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2279 >>2297

>>22182

>Explain to everyone what "graphic form" as far as being an AUTH TOOL goes, pleaseโ€ฆ Myself and others are in the weeds on this reference.

 

Graphic form means make a screen capture or some kind of visual evidence that can later be used to reconstruct what happened. Auth seems to mean authoritative. If enough of us retain screen captures, that is pretty authoritative.

Anonymous ID: 83f18d Jan. 7, 2018, 9:03 p.m. No.22403   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22228

Yes exactly.

May I add one qualifier:

Screen captures that are captured by somebody(s) who have a Twitter account, whose Twitter profile is set to the Eastern Time Zone.

Capturing the text in a database (e.g. github.io) is great but there must be visual evidence to go along with it.

I could do screen captures, but my non-EST timezone and lack of a Twitter account means I'd have to fudge/explain the timestamps (a barrier for explaining to normies). So I un-nominate myself to this task.

Anonymous ID: 83f18d Jan. 7, 2018, 9:09 p.m. No.22494   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2640

>>22228

Time differences of [5] minutes only? Please explain how you arrive at that. Lay it all out explicitly.

In the example we were given tonight there was a time difference of 15 minutes (first pair of tweets) then 62 minutes later, a time difference of 1 minute (second pair of tweets).

The related Post was 3 minutes prior to the first set of tweets.

 

How do you arrive at "highlight time differences of [5]" (minutes)?

 

If I'm confused undoubtedly others are too.

Anonymous ID: 83f18d Jan. 7, 2018, 9:21 p.m. No.22640   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2692

>>22494

POTUS will tweet first. I presume he cannot control exactly when the tweet will be received and timestamped by twitter due to potential conflicting network traffic and buffer latency at Twitter's servers.

 

Then Q will post here a definite time interval later. I presume he CAN control the exact time of posting here. We have seen plenty of evidence of that (like all the posts whose timestamp ended in exactly :59 seconds IIRC). And also operators who have posted with very strange tripcodes that were obviously manufactured and injected into 8ch's server rather than generated by hashing a password (!FogWarlock is one that I recall from today; there was one other I don't rememeber).

 

So the time delta will always be between a tweet and an 8ch post, with the tweet always being the earlier message of the pair.

 

Is that how you see it, Anons? Is my reasoning correct?